UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd
UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP | 3 cases |
Kenneth Tan Partnership | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.8
- Complex Cases
- 3 (75.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 33.7 parties avg |
14.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 14.0 parties avg |
2023 | 14.0 parties avg |
2022 | 13.0 parties avg |
2021 | 14.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of UD Trading Group Holding Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(75.0%) |
1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 8,000.001 cases |
USD | 63,301,903.332 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2024 | 1 1 |
2023 | 1 1 |
2022 | 1 1 |
2021 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
30 Jan 2024 | Defendant, Appellant | LostAppeal against the decision of AR Chong dismissed; judgment entered against the first defendant for US$63.3m with interest and costs. |
29 Jan 2023 | Defendant | LostDefendant's defenses were struck out, and judgment was entered against them for USD 63,303,806.66 (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies the amount in USD). |
02 Feb 2022 | Applicant | LostApplication for leave to appeal dismissed; UDTG to pay costs of SGD 8,000 to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
09 Dec 2021 | Defendant | Unknown |