UES Holdings Pte Ltd
UES Holdings Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 25.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
UES Holdings Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 8 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Eldan Law LLP | 1 case |
| WongPartnership LLP | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of UES Holdings Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.5
- Complex Cases
- 1 (25.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 22.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 14.0 parties avg |
| Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 14.0 parties avg |
| 2017 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2016 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of UES Holdings Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 2(50.0%) |
| Partial | 1(25.0%) |
| Won | 1(25.0%) |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 1 |
| 2017 | 1 1 |
| 2016 | 1 1 |
| 2015 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
21 Jan 2019 | Defendant | PartialThe court allowed the plaintiff's applications for injunctions restraining the call of performance bonds for the Changi and Jurong projects, but not for the Chestnut project. |
28 May 2017 | Plaintiff | LostThe Plaintiff's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed. |
25 Oct 2016 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed with costs to the appellant. The court is minded to fix these costs, and the parties are to submit written submissions setting out their arguments as to the appropriate quantum of these costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Oct 2015 | Plaintiff | WonPlaintiff's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination was allowed. |