Wham Kwok Han Jolovan
Wham Kwok Han Jolovan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 3 law firms.
Legal Representation
Wham Kwok Han Jolovan has been represented by 3 law firms and 9 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP | 2 cases |
Peter Low & Choo LLC | 3 cases |
Peter Low LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Wham Kwok Han Jolovan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.4
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 72.4 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 12.0 parties avg |
2020 | 22.5 parties avg |
2019 | 22.5 parties avg |
2018 | 13.0 parties avg |
2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Wham Kwok Han Jolovan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 7(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 2,500.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 1 1 |
2020 | 1 2 |
2019 | 1 2 |
2018 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
27 Sep 2022 | Appellant | LostAppeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
05 Nov 2020 | Applicant | LostThe criminal reference was dismissed, upholding the applicant's conviction under s 16(1)(a) of the Public Order Act. |
15 Mar 2020 | Appellant, Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Cease-publication injunction granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Oct 2019 | Appellant | LostAppellant's appeals against conviction and sentence for both charges were dismissed. |
28 Apr 2019 | Respondent | LostFine of SGD 5,000 imposed, with one week’s imprisonment in default. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
08 Oct 2018 | Respondent | LostConvicted for scandalising contempt under s 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Act 2016. |
21 Dec 2015 | Applicant | LostThe court dismissed Mr. Wham's application for judicial review. |