Yeh Mao-Yuan

Yeh Mao-Yuan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 14.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 57.1% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Yeh Mao-Yuan has been represented by 5 law firms and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Harry Elias Partnership LLP	4 cases	Toh Wei Yi Hee Theng Fong Nicklaus Tan Jaclyn Leong Ong Po Qin
Joo Toon LLC	2 cases	Lim Joo Toon
KhattarWong LLP	1 case	Deborah Barker
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC	1 case	Philip Ling Kam Kai Qi
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 case	John Wang Shing Chun Eugene Leong Fu Sheng

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Yeh Mao-Yuan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 4 (57.1%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.8 parties avg	3.8	57.1%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14.3%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14.3%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Yeh Mao-Yuan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(57.1%)	57.1%
Neutral	1(14.3%)	14.3%
Partial	1(14.3%)	14.3%
Won	1(14.3%)	14.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	11,093,451.25	2,218,690.255 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sgcai-3 19 Jun 2018	19 Jun 2018	Appellant, Defendant	PartialMr Yeh must account to TPG for a principal sum of S$2,171,250, being the value of the October 225m shares at the time of his dishonest misappropriation. Including interest calculated according to the Judge’s formula, Mr Yeh is to pay TPG the sum of S$2,749,888.13. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2017-sghci-3 12 Mar 2017	12 Mar 2017	Defendant	LostThe court dismissed the Defendant's summons and ordered the Defendant to pay costs fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2017-sgcai-2 09 Feb 2017	09 Feb 2017	Appellant, Respondent	LostThe appellant was ordered to furnish an additional SGD 20,000 as security for costs, bringing the total to SGD 50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2016-sghci-6 06 Dec 2016	06 Dec 2016	Defendant	LostOrdered to pay damages for unauthorized sales of shares and shortfall of loan funds, plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2015-sghc-170 02 Jul 2015	02 Jul 2015	Third Party	NeutralThird party claim against Mr. Yeh was dismissed; Credit Agricole to bear Mr. Yeh's costs on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2014-sghc-235 17 Nov 2014	17 Nov 2014	Third Party	WonThe third-party claim against Yeh Mao-Yuan was dismissed.
7	2013-sghc-40 18 Feb 2013	18 Feb 2013	Third Party, Appellant	LostThe third party's appeal for further and better particulars was dismissed.