Breach of Guarantee

Breach of Guarantee is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 13 cases from 2010 to 2015.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Breach of Guarantee, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate3 cases23.1% of area
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate3 cases23.1% of area
Rajah & Tann LLP50.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Lee & Lee100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Bajwa & Co0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
CLASIS LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Gabriel Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
WongPartnership LLP100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Breach of Guarantee, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Winston Kwek Choon Lin50.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Jiang Ke-Yue100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Tan Ruo Yu0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Quek Mong Hua100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Ang Cheng Hock100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Chia Voon Jiet0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Colin Liew0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Yeo Lai Hock Nichol0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Yap Neng Boo Jimmy0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Darrell Low Kim Boon0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 13 most recent judgments out of 13 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1City Harvest Church v AMAC Capital Partners: Unenforceability of Loan Agreements under Moneylenders ActHigh Court16 Nov 2015
Appeals allowed in part. The order setting aside the judgment against AMAC Capital Partners and the order giving Chew Eng Han leave to defend were unconditional for the First to Third Outstanding Tranches. For the Fourth Outstanding Tranche, the orders were conditional upon AMAC Capital Partners and/or Chew Eng Han furnishing security in the sum of $1.5m.
2William Jacks v Nelson Honey: Long-Arm Jurisdiction & Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court15 Sep 2015
Summons dismissed on the condition that William Jacks abandons proceedings in New Zealand if it fails to dismiss or stay proceedings there.
3Equatorial Marine v. Bunga Melati 5: Agency, Bunker Supply, & Shipowner LiabilityHigh Court21 Jul 2015
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
4Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & UnconscionabilityHigh Court10 Mar 2015
Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid.
5Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC SupplyCourt of Appeal29 May 2014
Appeal allowed with costs. Contracts discharged by frustration.
6Indian Overseas Bank v Svil Agro: Breach of Guarantee & Enforceability of JudgmentsHigh Court29 May 2014
Judgment for Plaintiff
7Fairview v Ong & Ong: Architectural Services Dispute & Wrongful TerminationCourt of Appeal19 Jan 2014
Fairview's appeal dismissed; Ong & Ong's appeal allowed.
8Holland Leedon v C & P Transport: Warehouseman Negligence & Liability for Damaged Metal CoilsHigh Court30 Dec 2013
Judgment for Plaintiff
9Chua Kwee Sin v Venerable Sek Meow Di: Dispute over USD 1M Casino InvestmentHigh Court28 Nov 2013
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
10Antariksa Logistics v McTrans Cargo: Conversion Claim over Detained Shipping ContainersHigh Court29 Jul 2012
Judgment for Plaintiffs
11MovingU v Trans-Cab: Breach of Contract & Mobile Credit Card Reader DisputeHigh Court27 Nov 2011
Plaintiff's action is dismissed with costs; remedies prayed for in the Defendant's counterclaim are granted with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
12Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng: Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement DisputeCourt of Appeal27 Nov 2011
Appeal Allowed
13Bing Integrated v Eco Special Waste: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy ClaimsHigh Court24 Oct 2010
Defendants’ claims in Suit No 605 of 2006/X and Suit No 606 of 2006/B against the 1st Third Party for breach of fiduciary duties by Colonel Chua are dismissed. The consequential allegations of conspiracy between Colonel Chua, Bing Integrated and 2nd Third Party are also dismissed.