Certificate of costs for three solicitors
Certificate of costs for three solicitors is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2003 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Certificate of costs for three solicitors, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
TSMP Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Allen & Gledhill LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Lim & Lim100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Certificate of costs for three solicitors, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Chan Tai-Hui100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Jason SC100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Leong Yi-Ming100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Wong Ling Yun100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Jonathan Tan Ming En100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Megan Chua100.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Thio Shen Yi0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Kenneth Chua0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Fu Wei Jun0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Nicholas0.00% success rate | 1 cases50.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | BTHMB Holdings Pte Ltd v Kim Byung Gun: Accounting for Cryptocurrency Sale Proceeds | General Division of the High Court | 01 Aug 2024 | I declare that Dr Kim has not provided a proper, complete, and accurate account. |
2 | Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non Conveniens | High Court | 07 Feb 2003 | Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed. |