Common Gaming Houses Act
Common Gaming Houses Act is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2000 to 2017.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Common Gaming Houses Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| Attorney-General’s Chambers50.00% success rate | 4 cases66.7% of area |
| Deputy Public Prosecutor0.00% success rate | 2 cases33.3% of area |
| Tan Kok Quan Partnership0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Wee, Tay & Lim LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Drew & Napier100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Leonard Loo LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Bajwa & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Common Gaming Houses Act, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| April Phang Suet Fern50.00% success rate | 2 cases33.3% of area |
| Hay Hung Chun0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Terence Chua0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Han Ming Kuang0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Phipps Jonathan0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Jimmy Yim100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Chan Tai-Hui Jason0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Liang Hanwen Calvin0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Ryan David Lim100.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
| Nicholas Lai Yi Shin0.00% success rate | 1 cases16.7% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bijabahadur Rai v Public Prosecutor: Assisting Illegal Lottery & Common Gaming Houses Act | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 09 Jul 2017 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
| 2 | Koh Chee Tong v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against 12-Week Imprisonment for Computer Misuse and Cybersecurity Act Offences | High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 08 Sep 2016 | Appeal dismissed. |
| 3 | Lim Bee Ngan Karen v PP: Parity Principle & Sentencing for Betting Act Offences | High Court | 15 Jul 2015 | Appeal allowed in part. The imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld. |
| 4 | Zhou Tong v Public Prosecutor: Gaming Offenses & Solicitor's Duty | High Court | 14 Jul 2010 | Appeals dismissed. |
| 5 | Lim Li Ling v PP: Sentencing for Assisting in Public Lottery under Common Gaming Houses Act | High Court | 18 Oct 2006 | Appeal Allowed in Part |
| 6 | Chua Seong Soi v PP: Common Gaming House Definition & Habitual Gaming | High Court | 25 Sep 2000 | Appeal allowed. |