Engineering Services
Engineering Services is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2004 to 2013.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Engineering Services, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
AsiaLegal LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Jacob Mansur & Pillai0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Navin & Co LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
C H Chan & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Haridass Ho and Partners0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
V K Rai and Partners0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Engineering Services, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Vijay Kumar Rai0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Palaniappan Sundararaj0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Navinder Singh100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Ramesh Bharani0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Anthony Leonard Netto0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Akbar Hussein Mansur Husain0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Ramesha Pillai0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Wendy Leong0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Desmond Lee0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Aero-Gate v Engen Marine: Breach of Contract for Diesel Generators | High Court | 30 Jul 2013 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
2 | Info Manufacturing v Mil-Com Aerospace: Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation in Aerospace Industry Takeover | High Court | 29 Mar 2010 | Judgment for the plaintiffs for $184,940.35 and interest. |
3 | Johnson Pacific v Hogberg: Costs, Pleadings & Particulars in Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Claim | High Court | 03 Aug 2004 | Defendants' appeal disallowed in part; Plaintiff's appeal on costs dismissed. |