Patent Amendments

Patent Amendments is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 9 cases from 2000 to 2011.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Patent Amendments, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Drew and Napier LLC33.33% success rate	3 cases33.3% of area	33.33% success rate	Tony Yeo (3 cases) Joanna Koh (3 cases) Rozalynne Asmali (1 cases)	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal(Dec 2005) Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal(Oct 2005) Trek Technology v FE Global Electronics: Patent Rights Dispute & Discovery of Internal Emails(Aug 2003)
Joseph Lopez and Co50.00% success rate	2 cases22.2% of area	50.00% success rate	Ponnampalam Sivakumar (2 cases)	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal(Dec 2005) Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal(Oct 2005)
Attorney-General’s Chambers0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Dominic Zou (1 cases)	Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal(Oct 2005)
Tan Kok Quan Partnership0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Ang Wee Tiong (1 cases)	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Discovery(Apr 2008)
Infinitus Law Corporation0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Wong Siew Hong (1 cases) G Radakrishnan (1 cases)	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Discovery(Apr 2008)
Rajah & Tann LLP0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Wendy Low Wei Ling (1 cases)	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation, Microbial Oil Mixtures, and Infant Formula Supplementation(Mar 2011)
Amica Law LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Jason Chan (1 cases) Wong Tsung Wei (1 cases)	Trek Technology v Ritronics Components: Interrogatories in Assessment of Damages(Dec 2006)
Ravindran Associates100.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	100.00% success rate	Ravindran s/o Muthucumarasamy (1 cases) Justin Blaze George (1 cases) Heng Su Lin @ Xing Suling (1 cases)	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step(Feb 2011)
Deputy Public Prosecutor100.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	100.00% success rate	Christina Koh (1 cases)	Cigar Affair v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Search Warrants & Trade Marks Act(Jun 2005)
Angela Wong & Co0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Yip Keng Fook Victor (1 cases) Tan Kim Chiang (1 cases)	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step(Feb 2011)

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Patent Amendments, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Joanna Koh33.33% success rate	3 cases33.3% of area	33.33% success rate	Experienced60% relevance score	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal(Dec 2005) Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal(Oct 2005) Trek Technology v FE Global Electronics: Patent Rights Dispute & Discovery of Internal Emails(Aug 2003)
Ponnampalam Sivakumar12.50% success rate	3 cases33.3% of area	12.50% success rate	Experienced66.25% relevance score	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal(Dec 2005) Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal(Oct 2005) Trek Technology v FE Global Electronics: Patent Rights Dispute & Discovery of Internal Emails(Aug 2003)
Tony Yeo33.33% success rate	3 cases33.3% of area	33.33% success rate	Experienced60% relevance score	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal(Dec 2005) Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal(Oct 2005) Trek Technology v FE Global Electronics: Patent Rights Dispute & Discovery of Internal Emails(Aug 2003)
Wendy Low Wei Ling50.00% success rate	2 cases22.2% of area	50.00% success rate	Experienced62.5% relevance score	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation, Microbial Oil Mixtures, and Infant Formula Supplementation(Mar 2011) Trek Technology v Ritronics Components: Interrogatories in Assessment of Damages(Dec 2006)
Ravindran s/o Muthucumarasamy100.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step(Feb 2011)
Yip Keng Fook Victor0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step(Feb 2011)
Daniel Koh0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced65% relevance score	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation, Microbial Oil Mixtures, and Infant Formula Supplementation(Mar 2011)
Arthur Yap0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Discovery(Apr 2008)
Ang Wee Tiong0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Discovery(Apr 2008)
Jason Chan0.00% success rate	1 cases11.1% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced60% relevance score	Trek Technology v Ritronics Components: Interrogatories in Assessment of Damages(Dec 2006)

Recent Judgments

Displaying 9 most recent judgments out of 9 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Martek v Cargill: Patent Revocation, Microbial Oil Mixtures, and Infant Formula Supplementation	High Court	28 Mar 2011	Applicant's appeal against the Tribunal's decision in the Revocation Proceedings is allowed. Both parties' appeal and cross-appeal against the Tribunal's decision in the Amendment Proceedings are dismissed, except regarding Claim 42 and consequently Claim 45 in the Proposed 2006 Amendments.
2	Dien Ghin v Khek Tai Ting: Patent Revocation for Lack of Novelty & Inventive Step	High Court	20 Feb 2011	Singapore Patent No 89534 be revoked, and that the defendant’s counterclaim against the plaintiff for infringement of the same patent be dismissed.
3	Main-Line Corporate Holdings Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Patent Infringement & Discovery	High Court	09 Apr 2008	Application granted in part; further discovery ordered from the second defendant.
4	Trek Technology v Ritronics Components: Interrogatories in Assessment of Damages	High Court	11 Dec 2006	Appeal dismissed.
5	Trek Technology v FE Global: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Patent Infringement Appeal	Court of Appeal	05 Dec 2005	Appeal Allowed
6	Platts-Mills v Trek Technology: Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel for Patent Infringement Appeal	High Court	06 Oct 2005	Application Granted
7	Cigar Affair v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference, Search Warrants & Trade Marks Act	High Court	30 Jun 2005	Application dismissed.
8	Trek Technology v FE Global Electronics: Patent Rights Dispute & Discovery of Internal Emails	High Court	24 Aug 2003	Appeal allowed in part; the right to make the discovery application was reserved before the trial judge.
9		-	30 Oct 2000	Unknown