Pre-judgment interest

Pre-judgment interest is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 8 cases from 2005 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Pre-judgment interest, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
PK Wong & Nair LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Covenant Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
FC Legal Asia LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Rajah & Tann LLP100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Harry Elias Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Timothy Ng LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Pre-judgment interest, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Sunil Sudheesan100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Tay Yong Seng0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Toh Jia Jing Vivian0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Benaiah Lim Oon Kuan0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Foo Maw Shen0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Chu Hua Yi0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Foo Jyh Howe0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Nair Suresh Sukumaran0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Noel Chua Yi How0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 8 most recent judgments out of 8 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over Bond Amount Release and Pre-Judgment InterestSingapore International Commercial Court17 Oct 2024
The court assessed the post-transfer costs payable by TIH to TIL in the total sum of $805,500 including disbursements, excluding goods and service tax, and after deductions, ordered TIH to pay TIL the net sum of $790,500. The court declined to award any pre-judgment interest.
2Li Jialin v Wingcrown Investment: Forfeiture of Deposit, Remedies, and Pre-Judgment InterestGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore11 Sep 2023
The Respondent was entitled to forfeit $380,000 as a true deposit. The Respondent was to retain the remaining $326,243.07 pending the determination of its claim of equitable set-off in an assessment of damages hearing.
3Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer ReferencesCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Jul 2016
Appeal Allowed in Part
4Longyuan-Arrk v Show and Tell: Breach of Contract, Defamation, and Signage Installation DisputeHigh Court21 Aug 2013
Judgment for the Defendant in the amount of $105,566.55
5World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
6Zhu Yong Zhen v American International Assurance: Breach of Contract & Collusion ClaimsHigh Court16 Aug 2010
Appeal dismissed.
7Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing AppealHigh Court06 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
8Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation ActionHigh Court09 Nov 2005
The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed.