Protection of contractual rights

Protection of contractual rights is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2005 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Protection of contractual rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Nine Yards Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Legal Solutions LLC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
WMH Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Skandan Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Wong Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Wong Thomas and Leong0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Protection of contractual rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Zhang Jun0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Kevin Kwek Yiu Wing100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Gregory Vijayendran0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Yeo Lai Hock Nichol0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Qua Bi Qi0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Prakash Pillai0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Wong Thai Yong0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Tan Yiting Gina100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Raymond Wong0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Sarah Yeo Qi Wei0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Gazelle Ventures v. Lim Yong Sim: Quia Timet Injunction & Breach of ContractGeneral Division of the High Court19 Nov 2023
Originating Application Dismissed
2-23 Oct 2023
Unknown
3Full House Building Construction v Tan Hong Joo: Breach of Contract & Director's DutiesGeneral Division of the High Court27 Apr 2023
Judgment for Plaintiff in part and Defendant in part.
4Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation ActionHigh Court09 Nov 2005
The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed.