CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd

CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 14 counsels. Through 4 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 40.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 14 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
LVM Law Chambers LLC	2 cases	Lee Sien Liang Joseph Qabir Singh Sandhu Yap Pei Yin Corinne Taylor
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Vikram Nair Zhuang Wenxiong Ching Meng Hang
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	Lim Min N Sreenivasan Vithyashree Shankar A S
MPillay	1 case	Mohan Pillay Yeo Boon Tat Josephine Tong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.4
Complex Cases: 2 (40.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	54.4 parties avg	4.4	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of CKR Contract Services Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sghc-133 28 Jun 2020	28 Jun 2020	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claims in conspiracy against the first defendant are struck out in their totality.
2	2020-sghc-81 26 Apr 2020	26 Apr 2020	Plaintiff	LostCKR's application for leave to appeal the arbitral award was dismissed.
3	2019-sghc-41 21 Feb 2019	21 Feb 2019	Respondent	LostApplication allowed; declaratory and injunctive reliefs granted in respect of the Item 3 and Item 4 documents. Costs of the application and reasonable disbursements to be paid by CKR to Asplenium, the quantum of which was to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2016-sghc-85 11 May 2016	11 May 2016	Defendant	LostDefendant's application was dismissed; the court declared Payment Claim No. 22 invalid and ordered the Defendant to withdraw Adjudication Application No. SOP/AA 423 of 2015 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2015-sgca-24 21 Apr 2015	21 Apr 2015	Appellant, Respondent	LostCKR's appeal against the Judge’s decision was dismissed.