Credit Suisse AG

Credit Suisse AG is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 16 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 71.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 71.4% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Credit Suisse AG has been represented by 5 law firms and 16 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	2 cases	Chua Sui Tong Lim Wei Lee Lim Yuan Jing Chan Daniel Daniel Chan
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Daniel Liang Corina Song Teo Jen Min
Audent Chambers LLC	2 cases	Jordan Tan Harpreet Singh
Cavenagh Law LLC	1 case	Jordan Tan Harpreet Singh Nehal Andrew Foo Ho Wan Yi
Cavenagh Law LLP	1 case	Foo Chuan Min Jerald Harpreet Singh Nehal SC Goh Rui Xian Elsa

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Credit Suisse AG's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 5 (71.4%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	14.3%
Neutral	15.0 parties avg	5.0	14.3%
Won	53.8 parties avg	3.8	71.4%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Credit Suisse AG's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14.3%)	14.3%
Neutral	1(14.3%)	14.3%
Won	5(71.4%)	71.4%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	269,000.00	53,800.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghca-7 04 Mar 2024	04 Mar 2024	Respondent	WonLuckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision of the Judge in RA 206 was dismissed. The court ordered Luckin to pay the costs of the application fixed at $7,000, inclusive of disbursements, to the Claimants collectively, and also to Credit Suisse AG individually. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2023-sghc-198 23 Jul 2023	23 Jul 2023	Defendant, Respondent	WonSuccessfully resisted the appeal against the AR's order for production of documents. To bear their own costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2022-sghcr-9 27 Sep 2022	27 Sep 2022	Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim	WonApplication for security for costs allowed; defendant to provide security in the amount of $265,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2019-sghc-6 17 Jan 2019	17 Jan 2019	Defendant	WonApplication for stay of proceedings granted.
5	2017-sghc-137 01 Jun 2017	01 Jun 2017	Defendant, Respondent	WonPlea of malice struck out; Credit Suisse awarded costs of $4,000 with reasonable disbursements from Ezion. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2016-sghc-159 14 Aug 2016	14 Aug 2016	Respondent, Defendant	NeutralNeutral outcome as the bank was subject to a discovery order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2016-sghcr-3 25 Feb 2016	25 Feb 2016	Defendant	LostRequired to disclose documents related to accounts held by Zhang Lan and Success Elegant Trading Limited.