CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd

CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 16 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 16 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 case	Jaikanth Shankar Tan Mao Lin Davinder Singh SC David Fong Vanessa Poo Shannon Peh
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC	2 cases	Lim Wei Ming Keith Michael Palmer Palmer Michael Anthony Wee Shilei Ng Joel Yuan-Ming Joyce Khoo Michael Anthony Palmer Martin Eddie Butler Joel Ng Yuan-Ming Sharmaine Chan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of CSAPL (Singapore) Holdings Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	42,950,829.71	42,950,829.711 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sgcai-2 09 Jan 2022	09 Jan 2022	Respondent, Defendant	LostAppeal dismissed; all outstanding amounts under the Loan Agreement are due and payable. The court assumed USD as the loan was extended in USD.
2	2021-sghci-1 11 Mar 2021	11 Mar 2021	Defendant	WonThe court ruled in favor of CSAPL, finding that it had used its best efforts to ensure the director's attendance at board meetings and was therefore not in breach of the Deed of Undertaking.
3	2020-sghci-5 03 Mar 2020	03 Mar 2020	Defendant	PartialThe court ordered a stay in relation to all matters other than the clause 2(c) issues.