Full Fledge Holdings Ltd

Full Fledge Holdings Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Full Fledge Holdings Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Shook Lin and Bok	1 case	Chua Sui Tong Vinodh Coomaraswamy Vinodh S Coomaraswamy Kenneth Choo
Tan Rajah and Cheah	1 case	C R Rajah
Harry Elias Partnership	1 case	Tan Lee Cheng Kenneth Leong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Full Fledge Holdings Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Full Fledge Holdings Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2005-sgca-21 10 Apr 2005	10 Apr 2005	Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff	WonFull Fledge's appeal in CA 95/2004 was allowed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be refunded to Full Fledge. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
2	2004-sghc-209 19 Sep 2004	19 Sep 2004	Plaintiff	PartialPlaintiff directed to incorporate the amendment into the Statement of Claim, which should then be reflected in the judgment.
3	2004-sghc-141 29 Jun 2004	29 Jun 2004	Plaintiff	WonPlaintiff's claim allowed; the defendant is ordered to transfer 10,625,000 UFS shares to Bank of China for the account of Kang. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.