GTMS Construction Pte Ltd

GTMS Construction Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 83.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

GTMS Construction Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Ling Das & Partners	1 case	Yap Wei Xuan Mendel Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam Ling Koon Hean David Mendel Yap S Thulasidas

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of GTMS Construction Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 5 (83.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	16.7%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%
Won	33.3 parties avg	3.3	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of GTMS Construction Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(16.7%)	16.7%
Partial	2(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	3(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,611,906.95	435,317.836 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghca-34 02 Oct 2022	02 Oct 2022	Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim	PartialJudgment for Plaintiff upheld with modifications. Liable for failing to paint all four sides of the steel beams.
2	2021-sghca-2 25 Mar 2021	25 Mar 2021	Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim	PartialGTMS was awarded $1,000 in costs from Ser Kim Koi for the leave application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2021-sghc-33 09 Feb 2021	09 Feb 2021	Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim	WonCosts awarded on a standard basis from 13 January 2014 up until 8 November 2018, with costs payable on an indemnity basis thereafter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2016-sgca-7 03 Mar 2016	03 Mar 2016	Respondent, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed; judgment and orders for costs entered into below by the AR and the Judge are set aside. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	2014-sghc-232 03 Nov 2014	03 Nov 2014	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $620,816.32 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2011-sghc-62 21 Mar 2011	21 Mar 2011	Defendant	WonJudgment for the Defendant for $265,358.83 (including GST) on its counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.