Hamzah bin Ibrahim

Hamzah bin Ibrahim is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 6 law firms. They have been involved in 9 complex cases, representing 81.8% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Hamzah bin Ibrahim has been represented by 6 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
ARShanker Law Chambers	1 case	A Revi Shanker
K K Cheng Law LLC	3 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
Luke Lee & Co	1 case	Luke Lee Yoon Tet
Winchester Law LLC	1 case	Sukdave Singh S/O Banta Singh
Kana & Co	1 case	N Kanagavijayan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hamzah bin Ibrahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 16.6
Complex Cases: 9 (81.8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	919.6 parties avg	19.6	81.8%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	9.1%
	14.0 parties avg	4.0	9.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2025	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	137.0 parties avg	37.0
2023	220.5 parties avg	20.5
2022	321.3 parties avg	21.3
2021	216.0 parties avg	16.0
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hamzah bin Ibrahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(81.8%)	81.8%
Neutral	1(9.1%)	9.1%
	1(9.1%)	9.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	10,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2021	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2025-sgca-6 13 Feb 2025	13 Feb 2025	Applicant	LostApplication for permission to make a review application was dismissed.
2	2024-sgca-11 26 Mar 2024	26 Mar 2024	Appellant, Applicant	LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing.
3	2023-sghc-346 04 Dec 2023	04 Dec 2023	Applicant	LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
4	2023-sgca-44 29 Nov 2023	29 Nov 2023	Other	Unknown
5	2022-sgca-58 03 Aug 2022	03 Aug 2022	Appellant, Claimant	LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed.
6	2022-sghc-140 22 Jun 2022	22 Jun 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2022-sghc-184 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2021-sghc-274 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
9	2021-sghc-270 29 Nov 2021	29 Nov 2021	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the OS to be borne by counsel personally instead of the plaintiff.
10	2018-sgca-45 01 Aug 2018	01 Aug 2018	Appellant	NeutralAppeal adjourned to an early date to be fixed, such date not to be before 16 August 2018.
11	2017-sghc-228 20 Sep 2017	20 Sep 2017	Defendant	LostConvicted of having possession of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking. Sentenced to death.