Iskandar bin Rahmat

Iskandar bin Rahmat is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 9 law firms. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 54.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Iskandar bin Rahmat has been represented by 9 law firms and 12 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Independent Practitioner	1 case	Iskandar bin Rahmat
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Teo Ying Ying Denise Wong Hin Pkin Wendell Bryan Wong
Robertson Chambers LLC	1 case	Terence Tan
KhattarWong LLP	1 case	Shashi Nathan Jeremy Pereira Tania Chin
Carson Law Chambers	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy
K K Cheng Law LLC	2 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy
Hilborne & Co	1 case	Rajan Supramaniam
Lexcompass LLC	1 case	Ferlin Jayatissa Sudha Nair

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Iskandar bin Rahmat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 14.5
Complex Cases: 6 (54.5%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	1015.8 parties avg	15.8	90.9%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	9.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2025	217.0 parties avg	17.0
2024	137.0 parties avg	37.0
2023	137.0 parties avg	37.0
2022	126.0 parties avg	26.0
2021	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Iskandar bin Rahmat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(90.9%)	90.9%
Neutral	1(9.1%)	9.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2025	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 31	Lost: 3 cases (150.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 11 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2025-sghc-20 04 Feb 2025	04 Feb 2025	Applicant	LostApplication dismissed due to lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
2	2025-sgca-4 03 Feb 2025	03 Feb 2025	Applicant	LostApplication for permission to make a review application and for a stay of execution was dismissed.
3	2024-sgca-11 26 Mar 2024	26 Mar 2024	Appellant, Applicant	LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing.
4	2023-sghc-346 04 Dec 2023	04 Dec 2023	Applicant	LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
5	2022-sgca-58 03 Aug 2022	03 Aug 2022	Appellant, Claimant	LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed.
6	2021-sghc-270 29 Nov 2021	29 Nov 2021	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the OS to be borne by counsel personally instead of the plaintiff.
7	2021-sgca-107 18 Nov 2021	18 Nov 2021	Appellant, Applicant	LostThe Appellant's appeal against the Judgment was dismissed.
8	2021-sgca-89 20 Sep 2021	20 Sep 2021	Applicant	LostApplication for leave to intervene in CCA 36 was dismissed.
9	2021-sgca-1 07 Jan 2021	07 Jan 2021	Appellant, Applicant	NeutralApplication to strike out the appeal was dismissed; the substantive appeal will be heard in due course.
10	2017-sgca-9 02 Feb 2017	02 Feb 2017	Appellant	LostThe appeal against the conviction of murder was dismissed.
11	2015-sghc-310 03 Dec 2015	03 Dec 2015	Defendant	LostThe defendant was convicted of murder under section 300(a) of the Penal Code and sentenced to death.