Jurong Town Corp

Jurong Town Corp is a statutory board in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 14 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 21 counsels. Through 8 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Jurong Town Corp has been represented by 8 law firms and 21 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Dhillon Dinesh Singh Ho Chien Mien Sheik Umar bin Mohamed Bagushair Felicia Tan May Lian Dhillon Dinesh
Allen and Gledhill	1 case	Ng Lip Chih Ho Chien Mien J. Sathiaseelan K Shanmugam K Shanmugam SC Karen Teoh J Sathia
Wong Partnership LLP	1 case	Ong Pei Chin Andre Maniam Wong Baochen
Allen & Gledhill	3 cases	Ho Chien Mien Jagateesan Sathiaseelan
Allen & Gledhilll LLP	1 case	William Ong Magdelene Sim
Allen and Gledhill LLP	1 case	Dinesh Dhillon Felicia Tan
Wong Partnership	1 case	Christopher Chong Andre Maniam
Ramdas & Wong	1 case	Constance Tay

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jurong Town Corp's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	35.7%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	14.3%
Won	72.1 parties avg	2.1	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jurong Town Corp's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(35.7%)	35.7%
Partial	2(14.3%)	14.3%
Won	7(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,113,220.10	1,422,644.025 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 14 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sghc-179 03 Sep 2012	03 Sep 2012	Plaintiff	WonSummary judgment granted to the plaintiff in terms of vacant possession of the Premises; costs and expenses of the execution of the Reinstatement Works, together with all Land Rent, Waterfront Fee, and all other amounts which the plaintiff would have been entitled to receive from the defendant had the period within which such Reinstatement Works were effected by the plaintiff been added to the Third Extended Term; double the rent of the Premises under s 28(4) of the Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed), at the rate of $154,672.67 per month from 16 February 2012 until vacant possession of the Premises was delivered to the plaintiff; contractual interest on the sums awarded pursuant to s 12 of the Civil Law Act (Cap 43, 1999 Rev Ed); and costs of the appeal and costs below to the plaintiffs on a full indemnity basis to be taxed unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2011-sghc-153 16 Jun 2011	16 Jun 2011	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe court dismissed the plaintiff's application.
3	2011-sghc-45 27 Feb 2011	27 Feb 2011	Respondent	WonCosts awarded to JTC fixed at $3,500 excluding disbursements which were to be paid by the plaintiff on a reimbursement basis. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2011-sghc-2 02 Jan 2011	02 Jan 2011	Defendant	LostDefendant’s striking out application in Summons 5748 of 2010 is dismissed.
5	2009-sghc-93 16 Apr 2009	16 Apr 2009	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2008-sgca-17 08 Apr 2008	08 Apr 2008	Respondent	PartialDamages awarded for additional expenses incurred by JTC as a result of WSL’s fraudulent misrepresentations, viz, item (c), item (d) and item (e).
7	2007-sghc-128 13 Aug 2007	13 Aug 2007	Defendant	PartialDefendant's claims allowed except for S$1,036,983.00 (administration of contract fee to JCPL) and $3,003.00 (costs for use of site). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	2006-sghc-82 17 May 2006	17 May 2006	Defendant, Respondent	LostAppeal against the decision to disallow the amendment was dismissed.
9	2005-sgca-25 12 May 2005	12 May 2005	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; contract validly terminated; damages to be assessed by the Registrar (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	2004-sghc-255 21 Nov 2004	21 Nov 2004	Defendant	LostThe defendant's counterclaim for damages for misrepresentation was dismissed.
11	2004-sgca-14 30 Mar 2004	30 Mar 2004	Appellant, Defendant	LostJTC's appeal against the High Court's decision to deny security for costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	2003-sghc-276 07 Oct 2003	07 Oct 2003	Defendant, Appellant	LostThe defendant's appeal for security of costs was dismissed.
13	2003-sghc-12 26 Jan 2003	26 Jan 2003	Defendant, Respondent	WonThe application for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal was dismissed.
14	2002-sghc-175 07 Aug 2002	07 Aug 2002	Plaintiff	WonJurong Town Corporation was entitled to seize the Strippit machine under the writ of distress to recover arrears in rent amounting to $387,099.13 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).