Lal Hiranand

Lal Hiranand is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Lal Hiranand has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Kenneth Tan Partnership	1 case	Kenneth Tan
Sant Singh Partnership	2 cases	Kenneth Tan Parveen Kaur Parveen Kaur Nagpal Murugaiyan Sivakumar Siva Murugaiyan
Madhavan Partnership	1 case	Parveen Kaur Nagpal Siva Murugaiyan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lal Hiranand's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lal Hiranand's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2007-sgca-5 28 Jan 2007	28 Jan 2007	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed, with costs here and below. The deposit for costs paid by the appellant is to be refunded to him. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2006-sghc-98 05 Jun 2006	05 Jun 2006	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claim that the 1999 deed be set aside or declared unenforceable was dismissed.
3	2003-sghc-171 07 Aug 2003	07 Aug 2003	Defendant	NeutralNo orders were made in respect of Summons-in-Chambers No 600208 of 2003 as the issues there have been rendered irrelevant by reason of the disposal of the plaintiff’s summons-in-chambers.