Lee Cross

Lee Cross is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lee Cross has been represented by 2 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Harry Elias Partnership	1 case	Tan Chee Meng Michael Palmer Harry Elias Andy Lim
Rajah & Tann	1 case	Lionel Tan V K Rajah Simon Cheong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Cross's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33.3%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33.3%
Won	19.0 parties avg	9.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2000	29.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Cross's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2001-sghc-94 14 May 2001	14 May 2001	Defendant	WonDefendants' applications for discovery allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2000-sgca-23 23 Apr 2000	23 Apr 2000	Defendant	PartialAppeal allowed in part regarding the right to seek discovery, but the specific discovery requests were deemed too broad. Applications remitted for reconsideration. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
3	2000-sgca-12 08 Mar 2000	08 Mar 2000	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.