Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd
Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 14.3% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 5 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| M Rama Law Corporation | 1 case |
| United Legal Alliance LLC | 1 case |
| Mimi Oh & Associates | 1 case |
| Bernard & Rada Law Corporation | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.7
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 23.0 parties avg |
| Neutral | 13.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
| Settled | 13.0 parties avg |
| Won | 12.0 parties avg |
| 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 22.5 parties avg |
| 2017 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2012 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2011 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2010 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2007 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Liberty Insurance Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 2(28.6%) |
| Neutral | 1(14.3%) |
| Partial | 1(14.3%) |
| Settled | 1(14.3%) |
| Won | 1(14.3%) |
| 1(14.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 121,741.785 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 11 |
| 2017 | 1 1 |
| 2012 | 1 1 |
| 2011 | 1 1 |
| 2010 | 1 1 |
| 2007 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
23 Aug 2018 | Respondent | WonCosts of $5500 inclusive of disbursements ordered in favor of Liberty Insurance (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
19 Jul 2018 | Defendant | NeutralThe second defendant was unrepresented and the outcome did not directly affect them. |
22 May 2017 | Respondent | LostAppeal allowed; the decision of the AC that the policy issued by Liberty was not engaged because of the Tiler Objection was set aside. Liberty to pay costs of $3,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the appellant for this appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
07 May 2012 | Defendant, Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |
23 Jun 2011 | Defendant | PartialDefendant granted leave to defend upon condition that the defendant pays into court, or provides security by way of a banker’s guarantee, 70% of the sum of S$857,441.25 (ie the sum of $600,208.88), by 8 July 2011, failing which the plaintiff would be at liberty to enter final judgment against the defendant. Currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 Aug 2010 | Other | Unknown |
30 Jul 2007 | Third Party | SettledThe third party action was eventually settled. |