Metalform Asia Pte Ltd

Metalform Asia Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 30.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Metalform Asia Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 9 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Tan Rajah & Cheah	6 cases	Chew Kei-Jin Chelva Rajah Moiz Haider Sithawalla Chelva Retnam Rajah Yeo Boon Tat Moiz Sithawalla C R Rajah CR Rajah Lavinia Rajah
Moiz Sithawalla with Lavinia Rajah	1 case	Moiz Sithawalla

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Metalform Asia Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 3 (30.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.5 parties avg	2.5	40.0%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	10.0%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	10.0%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	40.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	24.5 parties avg	4.5
2008	25.5 parties avg	5.5
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Metalform Asia Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(40.0%)	40.0%
Neutral	1(10.0%)	10.0%
Partial	1(10.0%)	10.0%
Won	4(40.0%)	40.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sghc-90 29 Apr 2012	29 Apr 2012	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2011-sghc-32 13 Feb 2011	13 Feb 2011	Defendant, Applicant	LostThe Defendant's application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision made on 17 September 2010 in Originating Summons No 1679 of 2007 was denied.
3	2010-sghc-280 16 Sep 2010	16 Sep 2010	Respondent, Purchaser	LostThe court granted the applicant leave to appeal the arbitrator's decision. No monetary amount was specified.
4	2009-sgca-29 30 Jun 2009	30 Jun 2009	Respondent	WonHolland Leedon's application to vary the injunction was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2009-sghc-5 06 Jan 2009	06 Jan 2009	Defendant	Neutral
6	2008-sghc-131 12 Aug 2008	12 Aug 2008	Plaintiff	LostAppeal against the decision to strike out portions of the statement of claim was dismissed with costs.
7	2008-sghc-23 12 Feb 2008	12 Feb 2008	Defendant	PartialThe fifth defendant's appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision was allowed in part.
8	2007-sgca-6 12 Feb 2007	12 Feb 2007	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed with costs below and on appeal to follow the event, and the usual consequential orders. The court found that Metalform Asia had a genuine cross-claim based on substantial grounds and that the filing of a winding-up petition would likely cause irreparable harm to Metalform Asia's business and reputation. The court also found that Holland Leedon had not shown any special circumstances why the court should not restrain them from presenting a winding-up petition against Metalform Asia. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
9	2006-sghc-178 30 Aug 2006	30 Aug 2006	Defendant	WonDefendant successfully resisted the plaintiff's application for access to documents based on conflict of interest and legal privilege.
10	2006-sghc-74 04 May 2006	04 May 2006	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application for an injunction to restrain the defendant from presenting a winding-up petition was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).