Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff

Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 4 law firms. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff has been represented by 4 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	1 case	Chooi Jing Yen Eugene Thuraisingam
Ong Ying Ping Esq	1 case	Ong Ying Ping
K K Cheng Law LLC	2 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 14.3
Complex Cases: 4 (66.7%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	614.3 parties avg	14.3	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	321.3 parties avg	21.3
2021	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Muhammad Faizal Bin Mohd Shariff's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	10,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sgca-15 15 May 2023	15 May 2023	Applicant	LostApplication for permission to make a review application was dismissed summarily. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2022-sgca-58 03 Aug 2022	03 Aug 2022	Appellant, Claimant	LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed.
3	2022-sghc-140 22 Jun 2022	22 Jun 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2022-sghc-184 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2021-sghc-274 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
6	2019-sghc-17 27 Jan 2019	27 Jan 2019	Defendant	LostThe Defendant was convicted of the charge.