Teo Wai Cheong

Teo Wai Cheong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Teo Wai Cheong has been represented by 2 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Tan Rajah & Cheah	1 case	Tham Lijing Chelva Rajah C R Rajah
Hin Tat Augustine & Partners	1 case	Chelva Rajah Gong Chin Nam Sean Lim Thian Siong Chelva R Rajah Sean Lim

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Wai Cheong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Wai Cheong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,459,519.83	6,459,519.831 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2013-sgca-33 16 May 2013	16 May 2013	Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; the Bank’s claims against Teo are dismissed. Teo’s counterclaim against the Bank for wrongful liquidation of his assets and for wrongful set off of any cash balances in his account is allowed. The Bank is to pay such sum found to be due to Teo with interest from the date of such wrongful liquidation and/or set off to the date of payment at the rate of 3% per annum. If the account and the extent of any repayment due to Teo cannot be agreed between the parties, the matter is to be remitted to the Retrial Judge for determination. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2012-sghc-94 02 May 2012	02 May 2012	Defendant	LostTeo's counterclaim was dismissed, and he was ordered to pay CIC $2,782,803.66 for the shares delivered, $3,625,393.11 for closing out costs, and interest of $51,323.06 as of 29 August 2008 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2011-sgca-13 10 Apr 2011	10 Apr 2011	Appellant	WonThe appeal was allowed, and the judgment of the Judicial Commissioner was set aside. A new trial was ordered.
4	2010-sghc-155 19 May 2010	19 May 2010	Defendant	LostClaim dismissed against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.