Wishing Star Ltd
Wishing Star Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 13 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 57.1% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
Wishing Star Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 13 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Wong Partnership | 1 case |
Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
Drew and Napier LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Wishing Star Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 22.0 parties avg |
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 42.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 12.0 parties avg |
2007 | 12.0 parties avg |
2006 | 12.0 parties avg |
2005 | 12.0 parties avg |
2004 | 22.0 parties avg |
2003 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Wishing Star Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(28.6%) |
Partial | 1(14.3%) |
Won | 4(57.1%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 1 1 |
2007 | 1 1 |
2006 | 1 1 |
2005 | 1 1 |
2004 | 1 2 |
2003 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
08 Apr 2008 | Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed in part with regard to the award which the Judge made for damages claimed under item (a). |
13 Aug 2007 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's claims for work done and services rendered as well as for breach of copyright are dismissed. |
17 May 2006 | Plaintiff, Appellant | WonAppeal allowed with costs reserved. |
12 May 2005 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; contract validly terminated; ordered to pay damages to JTC (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
21 Nov 2004 | Plaintiff | WonThe court found that the defendant was not induced into the contract by any of the representations that had been found to be untrue, and further, that in the event, the defendant had, by its conduct, elected to affirm the contract after it had full notice of the facts and its rights in law. |
30 Mar 2004 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonThe appeal against WSL was dismissed, meaning WSL does not have to furnish security for costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
07 Oct 2003 | Plaintiff | WonThe defendants' appeal was dismissed, meaning the plaintiff was not required to provide security for costs. |