Wishing Star Ltd

Wishing Star Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 13 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 57.1% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Wishing Star Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 13 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wishing Star Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.0
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost22.0 parties avg
Partial12.0 parties avg
Won42.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
200812.0 parties avg
200712.0 parties avg
200612.0 parties avg
200512.0 parties avg
200422.0 parties avg
200312.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wishing Star Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(28.6%)
Partial1(14.3%)
Won4(57.1%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.002 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20081
1
20071
1
20061
1
20051
1
20041
2
20031
1

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
08 Apr 2008
AppellantPartialAppeal allowed in part with regard to the award which the Judge made for damages claimed under item (a).
13 Aug 2007
PlaintiffLostPlaintiff's claims for work done and services rendered as well as for breach of copyright are dismissed.
17 May 2006
Plaintiff, AppellantWonAppeal allowed with costs reserved.
12 May 2005
RespondentLostAppeal dismissed; contract validly terminated; ordered to pay damages to JTC (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21 Nov 2004
PlaintiffWonThe court found that the defendant was not induced into the contract by any of the representations that had been found to be untrue, and further, that in the event, the defendant had, by its conduct, elected to affirm the contract after it had full notice of the facts and its rights in law.
30 Mar 2004
Respondent, PlaintiffWonThe appeal against WSL was dismissed, meaning WSL does not have to furnish security for costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
07 Oct 2003
PlaintiffWonThe defendants' appeal was dismissed, meaning the plaintiff was not required to provide security for costs.