Zamri bin Mohd Tahir

Zamri bin Mohd Tahir is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 5 law firms. They have been involved in 8 complex cases, representing 80.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Zamri bin Mohd Tahir has been represented by 5 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	1 case	Eugene Thuraisingam
K K Cheng Law LLC	3 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
T H Ho Law Chambers	2 cases	Ho Thiam Huat
A Rohim Noor Lila & Partners	1 case	Ismail Bin Hamid

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Zamri bin Mohd Tahir's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 20.6
Complex Cases: 8 (80.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	1020.6 parties avg	20.6	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2025	132.0 parties avg	32.0
2024	137.0 parties avg	37.0
2023	137.0 parties avg	37.0
2022	321.3 parties avg	21.3
2021	216.0 parties avg	16.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Zamri bin Mohd Tahir's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	10(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	10,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 3	Lost: 3 cases (300.0%)
2021	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2025-sghc-20 04 Feb 2025	04 Feb 2025	Applicant	LostApplication dismissed due to lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
2	2024-sgca-11 26 Mar 2024	26 Mar 2024	Appellant, Applicant	LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing.
3	2023-sghc-346 04 Dec 2023	04 Dec 2023	Applicant	LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action.
4	2022-sgca-58 03 Aug 2022	03 Aug 2022	Appellant, Claimant	LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed.
5	2022-sghc-140 22 Jun 2022	22 Jun 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2022-sghc-184 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	2021-sghc-274 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
8	2021-sghc-270 29 Nov 2021	29 Nov 2021	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the OS to be borne by counsel personally instead of the plaintiff.
9	2019-sgca-9 10 Feb 2019	10 Feb 2019	Appellant	LostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
10	2017-sghc-79 02 May 2017	02 May 2017	Defendant	LostAccused convicted on Charge B1 and sentenced to death. The Defence's arguments for the Courier Exception were rejected, and the Prosecution did not provide a Certificate of Substantive Assistance.