Accessory liability

Accessory liability is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 13 cases from 2000 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Accessory liability, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP100.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Harry Elias Partnership50.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
TSMP Law Corporation50.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Providence Law Asia LLC0.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP50.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Tan Kok Quan Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
LVM Law Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Accessory liability, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Nguyen Vu Lan75.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Zhuo Jiaxiang0.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Lee Yu Lun Darrell100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Lau Hui Ming Kenny0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Chua Sui Tong100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Colin Liew100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Goh Kok Leong0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Harish Kumar50.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Vergis S Abraham0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Loo Yinglin Bestlyn0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 13 most recent judgments out of 13 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory LiabilityGeneral Division of the High Court30 Mar 2023
Claims in Suit 275 and Suit 345 are dismissed.
2U Myo Nyunt v First Property Holdings: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Breach of Trust & Fiduciary DutyCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore01 Aug 2021
Appeal Dismissed
3VKC v VJZ: Anti-Suit Injunction & Exclusive Jurisdiction in Estate DisputeCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Jul 2021
Appeal Dismissed
4Crest Capital Asia v OUE Lippo Healthcare: Conspiracy & Breach of Fiduciary DutyCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore29 Mar 2021
Appeal Allowed in Part
5Tamar Perry v Bonnet Esculier: Interpleader, Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment in Offshore CaseSingapore International Commercial Court29 Oct 2020
Application to strike out the unjust enrichment claim succeeded. Leave to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim was not granted in certain respects. The case was designated as an Offshore case.
6Lavrentiadis v Dextra Partners: Breach of Trust, Fiduciary Duty, and Accessory LiabilityHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore22 Jul 2020
Judgment for Plaintiff
7Compañia De Navegación Palomar v Koutsos: Accessory Liability, Director's Duties, Unjust Enrichment, TracingHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore22 Mar 2020
Judgment for Plaintiffs
8Innovative Corp v Ow Chun Ming: Director's Fiduciary Duties & Corporate OpportunityHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore12 May 2019
Judgment for Plaintiff
9Khalid Ali v Alwee Alkaff: Striking Out Action, Breach of Trust, Accessory LiabilityHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore27 Feb 2018
Appeal dismissed
10Zhou Weidong v Liew Kai Lung: Misrepresentation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, and Constructive Trust DisputeHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore26 Dec 2017
Judgment for Plaintiff
11Beyonics Technology Ltd v Goh Chan Peng: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and ConspiracyHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore27 Jun 2016
Judgment for Plaintiff
12Zage v Rasif: Dishonest Assistance & Knowing Receipt in Money Laundering via Precious StonesHigh Court29 Dec 2008
Plaintiffs' claims against the fourth and fifth defendants (Ho Chi Kwong and Jewels DeFred Pte Ltd) are dismissed. Judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs against the sixth defendant (Lim Soon Kiang).
13Banque Nationale de Paris v Hew Keong Chan Gary: Accessory Liability & Unauthorized TransactionsHigh Court19 Nov 2000
Plaintiff's claim dismissed; fourth and fifth defendants' counterclaim allowed.