Fraudulent Conveyance

Fraudulent Conveyance is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 5 cases from 2001 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Fraudulent Conveyance, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Ang & Partners50.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
Allen and Gledhill100.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
Khattar Wong and Partners0.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP100.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area
Engelin Teh & Partners100.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area
Ng Ong & Chee0.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Fraudulent Conveyance, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Ang Cheng Hock100.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
Chan Kia Pheng0.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
Leslie Chew0.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
Shaun Koh0.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
K Shanmugam100.00% success rate2 cases40.0% of area
Foo Maw Shen100.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area
Yeo Alexander Lawrence Han Tiong100.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area
Chew Jing Wei100.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area
Lee Suet Yean Cherlyn100.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area
Edwin Teong Ying Keat100.00% success rate1 cases20.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 5 most recent judgments out of 5 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Chee Yin Meh v Ong Kian Guan: Insolvency Law, Avoidance of TransactionsAppellate Division of the High Court26 Oct 2023
Appeal Dismissed
2-23 Oct 2023
Unknown
3Ng Bok Eng Holdings v Wong Ser Wan: Fraudulent Conveyance & Creditor's RightsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore27 Apr 2005
Appeal allowed in part.
4Wong Ser Wan v Ng Bok Eng Holdings: Fraudulent Conveyance & Creditor's RightsHigh Court05 Sep 2004
Defendants' application dismissed with costs.
5Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See: Director's Breach of Duty and Conspiracy to Defraud CreditorsHigh Court30 Dec 2001
Judgment against the First, Second, Third and Sixth Defendants for conspiracy to injure by unlawful means. Claims against Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh and Thirteenth Defendants dismissed.