Incorporation by reference
Incorporation by reference is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 3 cases from 2019 to 2024.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Incorporation by reference, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Law Firm | Cases |
|---|---|
| Holborn Law LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Drew & Napier LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Providence Law Asia LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| K&L Gates Straits Law LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Incorporation by reference, ranked by case volume and success rates.
| Lawyer | Cases |
|---|---|
| Tan Chee Meng SC0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Vergis S Abraham100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Tay Hong Zhi Gerald100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Zhuo Jiaxiang100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Belle Tan Ling Yi100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Chia Xin Ran Alina0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Gani Hui Ying Tracy0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Lim Min0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Cavinder Bull SC100.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
| Joan Peiyun Lim-Casanova0.00% success rate | 1 cases33.3% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 3 most recent judgments out of 3 total cases
| No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EBS Flow Control Ltd v Greene, Tweed & Co Pte Ltd: Contractual Terms, Termination & Interpretation | General Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore | 06 Jun 2024 | Claim dismissed; counterclaim allowed. |
| 2 | CJM v CJT: Recourse Against Arbitration Award for Dismissal of Earn-Out Payment Claim | SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT | 14 Jun 2021 | Plaintiffs' Originating Summons to set aside two paragraphs in the Award is dismissed. The plaintiffs’ application to amend their Originating Summons to set aside two further paragraphs is likewise dismissed. |
| 3 | Bintai Kindenko v Samsung C&T: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability Exception | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 29 May 2019 | Appeal dismissed. |