Inter vivos gift

Inter vivos gift is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 14 cases from 2003 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Inter vivos gift, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC50.00% success rate4 cases28.6% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate2 cases14.3% of area
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Nicholas & Tan Partnership LLP100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Nine Yards Chambers LLC100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Covenant Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
JCP Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Matthew Chiong Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Bih Li & Lee LLP0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Inter vivos gift, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Mohammad Shafiq bin Haja Maideen0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Wang Liansheng0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Manoj Belani100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen SC100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Lee Ee Yang0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Kee Lay Lian0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Tan Kay Kheng100.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Cheong Yon-Wen Jeremy0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area
Lee Eng Beng0.00% success rate1 cases7.1% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 14 most recent judgments out of 14 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Ho Dat Khoon v Chan Wai Leen: Setting Aside Inter Vivos Gift for Mistake in Land TransferGeneral Division of the High Court16 Nov 2023
Transfer set aside for mistake; rectification of land-register ordered.
2-23 Oct 2023
Unknown
3Quek Peng Hock Henry v Chia Swee Hun: Resulting Trusts, Inter Vivos Gifts, Undue InfluenceGeneral Division of the High Court31 May 2023
Judgment for Plaintiff
4Abdul Salam v Napisah: Gift Dispute Over Property ProceedsGeneral Division of the High Court19 Jun 2022
Action Dismissed
5Lim Choo Hin v Lim Sai Ing Peggy: Resulting Trusts & Inter Vivos Gift Dispute over HDB FlatAppellate Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore14 Dec 2021
Appeal Allowed
6Lyu Jun v Wei Ho-Hung: Resulting Trusts, Gifts, and Intention to Create Legal RelationsGeneral Division of the High Court25 Nov 2021
Declarations granted that Mr. Lyu beneficially owns 100% of the D’Leedon apartment and the Car, and 80% of the Marne Road shop. Ms. Wei to pay sums and account for rental.
7Soemarto Sulistio v Stukan Yetty Fang: Inter Vivos Gift of Gold Bars & Constructive Trusts DisputeAppellate Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore22 Jul 2021
Appeal Dismissed
8Toh Eng Tiah v Angelina Jiang: Gifts, Inter Vivos, Contract Law, and Sham AgreementsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore04 Mar 2021
Appeal allowed in part. The court found the Loan Facilities Agreement to be a sham.
9Xu Zhigang v Wang Fang: Express Trusts, Gifts, Resulting Trusts, Promissory EstoppelHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore18 Nov 2020
Judgment for Plaintiff in part; claims for the apartment and car dismissed, but claims for the United States dollar sums allowed after deduction.
10Haja Maideen v Roshan Begum: Validity of Inter Vivos Gift of HDB Flat under Muslim Law and Housing and Development ActHigh Court of Singapore10 Jul 2017
Order granted in terms of prayers one and two stated in the originating summons.
11Ng Kwok Weng v Ng Meiling: Gift Inter Vivos Dispute Over Joint Bank AccountHigh Court28 Sep 2009
Plaintiffs' claim dismissed.
12Low Gim Siah v Low Geok Khim: Presumption of Advancement in Joint Bank AccountsCourt of Appeal21 Dec 2006
Appeal Allowed
13Yeoh Poh San v Won Siok Wan: Dispute over Gift of Moneys in Bank AccountsHigh Court23 Sep 2003
Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed with costs
14Tang Eng Seng v Tang Boon Kiat Eugene: Inter Vivos Gift & Estate DistributionHigh Court08 Sep 2003
Plaintiffs’ claim dismissed with costs