Rectification of Contracts

Rectification of Contracts is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 13 cases from 2009 to 2014.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Rectification of Contracts, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate5 cases38.5% of area
Rajah & Tann LLP66.67% success rate3 cases23.1% of area
MPillay100.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate2 cases15.4% of area
Advocatus Law LLP100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Lee & Lee100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Gabriel Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Bajwa & Co0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Rectification of Contracts, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Kronenburg Edmund Jerome0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Darrell Low Kim Boon0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Jiang Ke-Yue100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Colin Liew0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Koh Swee Yen0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Quek Mong Hua100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Ng Kim Beng0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Harjean Kaur100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Chia Voon Jiet0.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area
Lee Eng Beng100.00% success rate1 cases7.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 13 most recent judgments out of 13 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Xia Zhengyan v Geng Changqing: Share Transfer Agreement Dispute & Misrepresentation ClaimHigh Court29 Jul 2014
Plaintiff's claim dismissed and Defendant's counterclaim allowed in large part.
2Alliance Concrete v Sato Kogyo: Frustration of Contract & Sand Ban Impact on RMC SupplyCourt of Appeal29 May 2014
Appeal allowed with costs. Contracts discharged by frustration.
3Indian Overseas Bank v Svil Agro: Breach of Guarantee & Enforceability of JudgmentsHigh Court29 May 2014
Judgment for Plaintiff
4Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of ArrangementCourt of Appeal15 May 2014
Appeals allowed and the Judge’s decision to admit Mr Beloff on an ad hoc basis to represent nTan in the Setting-Aside Summonses was set aside.
5Fairview v Ong & Ong: Architectural Services Dispute & Wrongful TerminationCourt of Appeal19 Jan 2014
Fairview's appeal dismissed; Ong & Ong's appeal allowed.
6Holland Leedon v C & P Transport: Warehouseman Negligence & Liability for Damaged Metal CoilsHigh Court30 Dec 2013
Judgment for Plaintiff
7Chua Kwee Sin v Venerable Sek Meow Di: Dispute over USD 1M Casino InvestmentHigh Court28 Nov 2013
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
8Koh Chong Chiah v Treasure Resort: Breach of Membership Terms in Sijori Resort ClubHigh Court28 Nov 2012
Appeal Allowed in Part
9MovingU v Trans-Cab: Breach of Contract & Mobile Credit Card Reader DisputeHigh Court27 Nov 2011
Plaintiff's action is dismissed with costs; remedies prayed for in the Defendant's counterclaim are granted with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
10Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng: Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement DisputeCourt of Appeal27 Nov 2011
Appeal Allowed
11Doshion Ltd v Sembawang Engineers: Dispute Over Settlement Agreement and Arbitration TerminationHigh Court27 Feb 2011
Plaintiff's application dismissed.
12Bing Integrated v Eco Special Waste: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy ClaimsHigh Court24 Oct 2010
Defendants’ claims in Suit No 605 of 2006/X and Suit No 606 of 2006/B against the 1st Third Party for breach of fiduciary duties by Colonel Chua are dismissed. The consequential allegations of conspiracy between Colonel Chua, Bing Integrated and 2nd Third Party are also dismissed.
13Navigator Investment Services Ltd v Acclaim Insurance Brokers: Arbitration Stay & Pre-Action DiscoveryCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Sep 2009
Appeal against the decision in Summons 5059 allowed, but appeal against the decision in Registrar’s Appeal 383 dismissed.