Review

Review is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 17 cases from 2001 to 2025.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Review, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate5 cases29.4% of area
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Independent Practitioner0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
K&L Gates Straits Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
CK Tan Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Shook Lin & Bok LLP100.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Review, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Wong Woon Kwong100.00% success rate3 cases17.6% of area
Sarah Siaw100.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Yvonne Poon100.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Eva Teh Jing Hui0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Ng Jun Chong100.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Christina Koh100.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Ng Shu Wen0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Yeo Siew Chye Troy0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 17 most recent judgments out of 17 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Iskandar bin Rahmat v Public Prosecutor: Review Application and Stay of ExecutionCourt of Appeal of the republic of singapore03 Feb 2025
Application dismissed.
2-03 Nov 2024
Unknown
3Pausi bin Jefridin v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review, Reopening Concluded Decisions & ThresholdsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Sep 2024
Criminal Motions dismissed.
4Re CK Tan Law Corp: Extension of Time for Mortgage Registration under Companies ActGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore11 Aug 2024
Application dismissed with liberty to reapply.
5Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Application for Stay of ExecutionCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore01 Aug 2024
Application dismissed
6BWJ v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application Based on Change in LawCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore31 Jul 2024
Criminal Motion dismissed summarily.
7Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review ApplicationCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore29 Jul 2024
Application dismissed summarily.
8Public Prosecutor v JCS: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration of a Minor, and RiotingGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore03 Jul 2024
Appeal Allowed
9Darsan Jitendra Jhaveri v Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar: Appeal on Breach of Trust & Extension of Time ApplicationAppellate Division of the High Court24 Jun 2024
Application to strike out the appeal dismissed; no order made on applications to adduce further evidence.
10Nippon Shinyaku Co v Registrar of Patents: Patent Specification Correction DisputeGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Jul 2022
Appeal Allowed
11Nalpon Zero Geraldo Mario v Law Society of Singapore: Extension of Time & Judicial Review ApplicationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore21 Aug 2017
Application Dismissed
12Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer ReferencesCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Jul 2016
Appeal Allowed in Part
13World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
14Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing AppealHigh Court06 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
15Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation ActionHigh Court09 Nov 2005
The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed.
16Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.
17Tan Boon Hai v Singapore Hainan Hwee Kuan: Review of Costs Taxation in Election Irregularities CaseHigh Court29 Mar 2001
Application for review of costs allowed; original award of $100,000 restored; costs of review awarded to the defendants.