Standard form contracts

Standard form contracts is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 8 cases from 2011 to 2020.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Standard form contracts, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC50.00% success rate2 cases25.0% of area
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Lee & Lee100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Bajwa & Co0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Templars Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Chia Wong Chambers LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
KSCGP Juris LLP100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Ling Das & Partners0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Just Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Standard form contracts, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Darrell Low Kim Boon0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Jiang Ke-Yue100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Quek Mong Hua100.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Nakul Dewan0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Goh Wei Wei0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Darryl Chew Zijie0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Jimmy Yim0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Toh Jia Yi0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Ng Hweelon0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area
Dhillon Dinesh Singh0.00% success rate1 cases12.5% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 8 most recent judgments out of 8 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1CEQ v CER: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment ActHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore05 Apr 2020
Application dismissed.
2PEX International v Lim Seng Chye: Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher & ForeseeabilityCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore18 Dec 2019
Both appeals dismissed. The court upheld the High Court's decision that PEX was liable in nuisance and under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher, but clarified the role of foreseeability in these torts.
3BRQ v BRS: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Cost Overrun & BPTA ChargesHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore17 Nov 2019
Both applications dismissed, thereby leaving the award intact.
4Didwania v Hauslab: Enforcing Adjudication & Standard of Proof for Novation in ConstructionCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore16 Mar 2017
Appeal Dismissed
5Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Summary Judgment, SIA Conditions, Construction Contract, FraudCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore03 Mar 2016
Appeal Allowed
6Holland Leedon v C & P Transport: Warehouseman Negligence & Liability for Damaged Metal CoilsHigh Court30 Dec 2013
Judgment for Plaintiff
7MovingU v Trans-Cab: Breach of Contract & Mobile Credit Card Reader DisputeHigh Court27 Nov 2011
Plaintiff's action is dismissed with costs; remedies prayed for in the Defendant's counterclaim are granted with damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
8Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng: Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement DisputeCourt of Appeal27 Nov 2011
Appeal Allowed