Shareholders Rights

Shareholders Rights is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 17 cases from 2001 to 2023.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Shareholders Rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC33.33% success rate3 cases17.6% of area
WongPartnership LLP66.67% success rate3 cases17.6% of area
TSMP Law Corporation0.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Rajah & Tann LLP50.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Tan Rajah & Cheah0.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Advocatus Law LLP100.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Sim Chong LLC0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Cavenagh Law LLP0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Shareholders Rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Patrick Ang0.00% success rate2 cases11.8% of area
Teo Hee Sheng, Christian0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Harjean Kaur100.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Baldev Singh Bhinder0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Quek Mong Hua100.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Suresh s/o Damodara0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Sim Chong0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Ong Ziying Clement0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Foo Maw Shen100.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area
Chandra Mohan K Nair0.00% success rate1 cases5.9% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 17 most recent judgments out of 17 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Ng Yew Nam v Loh Sin Hock: Validity of EGM Resolutions & Director RemovalGeneral Division of the High Court11 Dec 2023
OA 855 is dismissed. In respect of OA 861, I grant a declaration that the resolutions passed at the meeting on 22 August 2023 are invalid and of no legal effect.
2-23 Oct 2023
Unknown
3-18 Apr 2023
Unknown
4Ng Tang Hock v Teelek Realty: Oppression, Director Duties & Loan RepaymentHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore07 Oct 2020
Order for Teelek Realty to be wound up.
5-26 Nov 2019
Unknown
6Liew Kit Fah v Koh Keng Chew: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder BuyoutCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Nov 2019
Appeal Allowed
7APBA Pte Ltd v Seah Shiang Ping: Quorum Requirements & Director Removal in Shareholder DisputeHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore24 Sep 2019
Application dismissed
8Ng Kian Huan v Suying: Minority Oppression & Director DutiesHigh Court of Singapore04 Mar 2019
Judgment for Plaintiff
9Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Oppression ClaimHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Mar 2017
Reference date for share valuation set as 17 February 2016.
10TYC Investment v Tay Yun Chwan: Shareholder Powers & Director Duties in Payment DisputesHigh Court09 Oct 2014
Originating Summons dismissed in its entirety, save for Consent Order No 1 and Consent Order No 2.
11Re Beloff Michael Jacob QC: Ad Hoc Admission, Legal Profession Act, Schemes of ArrangementCourt of Appeal15 May 2014
Appeals allowed and the Judge’s decision to admit Mr Beloff on an ad hoc basis to represent nTan in the Setting-Aside Summonses was set aside.
12Chan Tong Fan v Chiam Heng Luan Realty: Derivative Action, Directors' Duties, Family BusinessHigh Court26 Sep 2013
Application allowed in part.
13Dovechem Holdings v Ng Joo Soon: Director Removal & Company Record InspectionCourt of Appeal18 Jul 2011
Appeal Dismissed
14Ling Mang Khong Stanley v Teo Chee Siong: Striking Out Claim for Breach of Contract and OppressionHigh Court19 Jan 2011
Appeal Allowed
15Asia Pacific Wire & Cable Corp Ltd v Chik Kai-Ming Aaron: Director's Bonus, Pension, and Expense Reimbursement DisputeHigh Court26 Jun 2007
Judgment for the Second Defendant on most claims; Partial Judgment for the Second Plaintiff for a small portion of expense reimbursements; Judgment for the First and Second Defendants on their counterclaims.
16Lim Swee Khiang v Borden Co: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Act RemediesCourt of Appeal24 Sep 2006
Appeal allowed. The court found the respondents had acted in disregard of the appellants' interests as minority shareholders and ordered the respondents to purchase the appellants' shares in Borden.
17Tong Tien See Construction Pte Ltd v Tong Tien See: Director's Breach of Duty and Conspiracy to Defraud CreditorsHigh Court30 Dec 2001
Judgment against the First, Second, Third and Sixth Defendants for conspiracy to injure by unlawful means. Claims against Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh and Thirteenth Defendants dismissed.