Minority Shareholder Rights

Minority Shareholder Rights is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 25 cases from 2001 to 2025.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Minority Shareholder Rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC14.29% success rate7 cases28.0% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP0.00% success rate5 cases20.0% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate3 cases12.0% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC33.33% success rate3 cases12.0% of area
TSMP Law Corporation50.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Harry Elias Partnership50.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Cavenagh Law LLP0.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
TanLim Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases4.0% of area
Attorney-General’s Chambers100.00% success rate1 cases4.0% of area
Rev Law LLC100.00% success rate1 cases4.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Minority Shareholder Rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
N Sreenivasan25.00% success rate3 cases12.0% of area
Krishna Elan0.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Nikhil Daniel Angappan0.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Davinder Singh33.33% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Jimmy Yim0.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Chong Kah Kheng0.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Choo Ian Ming0.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Nish Kumar Shetty0.00% success rate2 cases8.0% of area
Hing Shan Shan Blossom0.00% success rate1 cases4.0% of area
Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen SC0.00% success rate1 cases4.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 25 most recent judgments out of 25 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Victory International v Borrelli: Receiver's Duties & Legal Profession Act AssessmentAppellate Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore15 Jan 2025
Appeal Allowed in Part
2-03 Nov 2024
Unknown
3Public Prosecutor v JCS: Statutory Rape, Sexual Penetration of a Minor, and RiotingGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore03 Jul 2024
Appeal Allowed
4Victory International Holdings v Borrelli: Receiver's Duty to Account & Legal FeesGeneral Division of the High Court18 Mar 2024
Originating Application allowed in part.
5Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share ValuationSingapore International Commercial Court20 Dec 2020
Senda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
6Poh Fu Tek v Vermont UM Bunkering: Statutory Derivative Action, Minority Shareholders & Good FaithHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore05 Jul 2020
Applicants’ proposed derivative actions allowed, subject to certain conditions.
7Anita Hatta v Lee Siow Kiang Georgia: Misrepresentation & Minority Oppression in DrGL Share InvestmentHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore23 Sep 2019
Judgment for the Plaintiff on the claim of minority oppression; the misrepresentation claim was dismissed.
8-28 May 2019
Unknown
9Wellness Group v. Paris Investment: Director Appointment Rights & Shareholders' AgreementsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore28 Aug 2018
Appeal Allowed
10Poh Fu Tek v Lee Shung Guan: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share ValuationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore24 Aug 2017
Judgment for Plaintiffs
11Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Oppression ClaimHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Mar 2017
Reference date for share valuation set as 17 February 2016.
12Ramesh v AXA Life: Negligence, Duty of Care, and Employer ReferencesCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore26 Jul 2016
Appeal Allowed in Part
13Tng Swee Seng v Lau Kim Swee: Dispute over Share Transfer Consideration and Alleged ForgeryHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore03 Jul 2016
Plaintiff’s claim and the Defendant’s counterclaim dismissed.
14Tomolugen v Silica: Arbitrability of Minority Oppression & Stay of ProceedingsCourt of Appeal25 Oct 2015
Appeal allowed in part.
15Sim City Technology v Ng Kek Wee: Minority Oppression & Director's Breach of DutyHigh Court22 Oct 2013
Judgment for Plaintiff against the first defendant; claim dismissed against the sixth defendant.
16World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
17Drydocks World LLC v Tan Boy Tee: Breach of Undertaking & Shareholding DisputeHigh Court24 Aug 2010
Originating Summons dismissed without prejudice to the plaintiff’s right to commence a writ action against the defendant based on cl 2.2.1(i) of the Deed and without prejudice to the defendant’s right to raise objections to the new cause of action.
18Sinwa SS (HK) Co Ltd v Morten Innhaug: Derivative Action & Director's DutiesHigh Court23 May 2010
Application dismissed
19Yeo Boong Hua v Turf Club Auto Emporium: Setting Aside Consent Order Due to Breach and MistakeHigh Court02 May 2010
Plaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs.
20Poondy Radhakrishnan v Sivapiragasam: Derivative Action for Breach of Fiduciary DutiesHigh Court08 Oct 2009
Application Allowed
21Chew Tong Seng v Chew Cheng Quee: Resulting Trust, Advancement, Estoppel & Minority Shareholder OppressionHigh Court22 Aug 2006
Judgment for Plaintiffs in Suit 333/2005; Originating Summons 1591/2004 dismissed.
22Sim Yong Kim v Evenstar Investments: Winding Up on Just and Equitable GroundsCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore17 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
23Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing AppealHigh Court06 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
24Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.
25Quah Su-Ling v Inno-Pacific Holdings Ltd: Abridgement of Time for EOGM Notice under Companies ActHigh Court23 Jul 2001
Order granted in terms of the plaintiff’s application for an abridgement of time, and prayers 1 and 2 of the Originating Summons.