Cosimo Borrelli
Cosimo Borrelli is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 20 counsels. Through 7 law firms. Their track record shows a 62.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 87.5% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Cosimo Borrelli has been represented by 7 law firms and 20 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
Providence Law Asia LLC | 1 case |
Cavenagh Law LLP | 2 cases |
Tan Kok Quan Partnership | 2 cases |
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 2 cases |
PK Wong & Nair LLC | 1 case |
Kenneth Tan Partnership | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Cosimo Borrelli's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 6.1
- Complex Cases
- 7 (87.5%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 14.0 parties avg |
Partial | 23.5 parties avg |
Won | 57.6 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2025 | 13.0 parties avg |
2024 | 24.0 parties avg |
2023 | 39.3 parties avg |
2020 | 15.0 parties avg |
2018 | 15.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Cosimo Borrelli's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 1(12.5%) |
Partial | 2(25.0%) |
Won | 5(62.5%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.005 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2025 | 1 1 |
2024 | 2 11 |
2023 | 1 3 |
2020 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 8 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
15 Jan 2025 | Respondent, Defendant | PartialAppeal partially lost to the extent that CCPL is ordered to deliver its bill for assessment by the court. |
25 Jul 2024 | Non-party | NeutralMr Borrelli was appointed as GLH’s liquidator. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Mar 2024 | Defendant | PartialThe court ordered Mr. Borrelli to furnish a copy of the Minority SPA to Victory. |
29 Nov 2023 | Respondent, Appellant | WonAppeal upheld; the court accepted the Omni Undertaking as an adequate form of security. No specific monetary amount was awarded, but costs were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Apr 2023 | Plaintiff, Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; security for costs to be furnished by way of an undertaking to the court jointly by Omni Bridgeway Limited and Omni Bridgeway (Singapore) Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 Feb 2023 | Other | WonOpposed the JM Applications. |
25 Feb 2020 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonAppeal upheld with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
02 Oct 2018 | Plaintiff | WonDeclarations granted in favour of the Plaintiffs; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |