Cosimo Borrelli

Cosimo Borrelli is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 20 counsels. Through 7 law firms. Their track record shows a 62.5% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 87.5% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Cosimo Borrelli has been represented by 7 law firms and 20 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cosimo Borrelli's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
6.1
Complex Cases
7 (87.5%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Neutral14.0 parties avg
Partial23.5 parties avg
Won57.6 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202513.0 parties avg
202424.0 parties avg
202339.3 parties avg
202015.0 parties avg
201815.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cosimo Borrelli's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Neutral1(12.5%)
Partial2(25.0%)
Won5(62.5%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.005 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20251
1
20242
11
20231
3
20201
1
20181
1

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
15 Jan 2025
Respondent, DefendantPartialAppeal partially lost to the extent that CCPL is ordered to deliver its bill for assessment by the court.
25 Jul 2024
Non-partyNeutralMr Borrelli was appointed as GLH’s liquidator. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18 Mar 2024
DefendantPartialThe court ordered Mr. Borrelli to furnish a copy of the Minority SPA to Victory.
29 Nov 2023
Respondent, AppellantWonAppeal upheld; the court accepted the Omni Undertaking as an adequate form of security. No specific monetary amount was awarded, but costs were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27 Apr 2023
Plaintiff, AppellantWonAppeal allowed; security for costs to be furnished by way of an undertaking to the court jointly by Omni Bridgeway Limited and Omni Bridgeway (Singapore) Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23 Feb 2023
OtherWonOpposed the JM Applications.
25 Feb 2020
Respondent, PlaintiffWonAppeal upheld with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
02 Oct 2018
PlaintiffWonDeclarations granted in favour of the Plaintiffs; damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.