DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd

DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 18 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 17.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 30.4% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 18 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen Manoj Belani Chloe Shobhana Ajit Adam Tan Ern-Ming Jimmy Yim Wing Kuen SC Samuel Wittberger Sia Tian Wa Jeremy Marc See Chern Yang Lee Soong Yan, Kevin Eunice Lau Guan Ting Lim Joe Jee Audie Wong Cheng Siew Teng Po Yew Audie Wong Yim Wing Kuen Jimmy Lee Song Yan Kevin Yim Wing Kuen Jimmy SC
Premier Law LLC	3 cases	See Chern Yang Audie Wong Cheng Siew Teng Po Yew

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 7 (30.4%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	8.7%
Neutral	123.1 parties avg	3.1	52.2%
Partial	45.0 parties avg	5.0	17.4%
Won	45.0 parties avg	5.0	17.4%
	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2023	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	53.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	55.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(8.7%)	8.7%
Neutral	12(52.2%)	52.2%
Partial	4(17.4%)	17.4%
Won	4(17.4%)	17.4%
	1(4.3%)	4.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,415,203.52	1,176,900.448 cases	8
USD	678,480.50	226,160.173 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2025	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 31	Neutral: 3 cases (150.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 3	Neutral: 3 cases (300.0%)
2022	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	3 131	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 3 cases (100.0%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2020	3 122	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2025-sgcai-1 30 Jan 2025	30 Jan 2025	Respondent, Defendant	NeutralDyStar took no position on the Appeals.
2	2024-sghci-25 28 Aug 2024	28 Aug 2024	Defendant	PartialKiri to pay DyStar costs in the sum of S$125,705.
3	2024-sghci-15 27 May 2024	27 May 2024	Defendant	NeutralNo specific outcome recorded for this party in this application.
4	2024-sghci-14 19 May 2024	19 May 2024	Defendant	NeutralThe court ordered an en bloc sale of the shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
5	2024-sghci-7 26 Mar 2024	26 Mar 2024	Defendant	NeutralNo specific outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is mentioned in this judgment.
6	2023-sgcai-3 13 Apr 2023	13 Apr 2023	Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff	NeutralDyStar's appeal (CA 58) was dismissed. The court ordered both Kiri and DyStar to bear their own costs for both CA 57 and CA 58. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2023-sghci-4 02 Mar 2023	02 Mar 2023	Defendant	NeutralThe judgment does not specify a direct outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
8	2023-sghci-3 07 Feb 2023	07 Feb 2023	Defendant	NeutralNo specific outcome was mentioned for this party in this judgment extract.
9	2022-sgcai-10 24 Nov 2022	24 Nov 2022	Defendant	Unknown
10	2022-sgcai-5 05 Jul 2022	05 Jul 2022	Respondent, Defendant	NeutralNeutral outcome. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	2021-sghci-18 26 Dec 2021	26 Dec 2021	Defendant	NeutralThe judgment does not specify an outcome for this party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	2021-sghci-16 07 Dec 2021	07 Dec 2021	Defendant	LostDyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to pay costs of S$4,960,815.26 and disbursements of S$3,100,826.85 to Kiri Industries Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	2021-sghci-12 23 Sep 2021	23 Sep 2021	Plaintiff	WonCounterclaim dismissed; DyStar awarded costs of SGD 1,137,856.41 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	2021-sghci-6 20 Jun 2021	20 Jun 2021	Defendant	NeutralThe judgment pertains to the valuation of shares in DyStar.
15	2021-sghci-2 02 Jun 2021	02 Jun 2021	Defendant	NeutralOutcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is neutral (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	2020-sghci-27 20 Dec 2020	20 Dec 2020	Defendant	NeutralThe outcome for DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd is neutral, as it is the subject of the share valuation. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	2020-sgcai-5 18 Oct 2020	18 Oct 2020	Respondent	PartialDamages awarded to DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd, but the quantum was reduced on appeal. DyStar's costs assessment below stands. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	2020-sghci-7 02 Mar 2020	02 Mar 2020	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of USD 678,480.50.
19	2020-sgcai-1 11 Feb 2020	11 Feb 2020	Respondent, Defendant	PartialAwarded 50% of the costs of its claim in Suit 3 against Kiri and Mr Manish.
20	2020-sghci-1 08 Jan 2020	08 Jan 2020	Plaintiff	WonDamages awarded to DyStar for Kiri's breach of contract; quantum to be calculated. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	2019-sghci-2 11 Mar 2019	11 Mar 2019	Defendant	PartialInterlocutory judgment with damages to be assessed for DyStar against Kiri for breach of cll 15.1(a) and (b) of the SSSA. DyStar was entitled to 10% of the costs of its claim against Kiri. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
22	2018-sgca-57 05 Sep 2018	05 Sep 2018	Respondent	LostAppeal allowed against the company. Costs awarded against the company in the aggregate sum of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	2017-sghc-314 18 Dec 2017	18 Dec 2017	Defendant	WonPlaintiff's application dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay costs of SGD 10,000. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).