MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD
MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 18 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 45.5% success rate in resolved cases.
Legal Representation
MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD has been represented by 3 law firms and 18 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Harry Elias Partnership LLP | 1 case |
Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
WongPartnership LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.1
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 12.0 parties avg |
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 22.0 parties avg |
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Won | 52.0 parties avg |
13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2019 | 12.0 parties avg |
2018 | 22.5 parties avg |
2016 | 12.0 parties avg |
2015 | 12.0 parties avg |
2014 | 22.0 parties avg |
2013 | 32.0 parties avg |
2011 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of MARINA BAY SANDS PTE LTD's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 1(9.1%) |
Lost | 1(9.1%) |
Neutral | 2(18.2%) |
Partial | 1(9.1%) |
Won | 5(45.5%) |
1(9.1%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 676,122.676 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 2 11 |
2016 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 1 |
2014 | 2 11 |
2013 | 1 3 |
2011 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 11 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
02 May 2019 | Plaintiff | DismissedBankruptcy application dismissed due to invalid service of the statutory demand. |
28 Jun 2018 | Other | Unknown |
26 Feb 2018 | Plaintiff, Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; the defendant was granted conditional leave to defend, requiring him to pay $3,500,000 into court within 14 days. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
08 May 2016 | Defendant | NeutralThe defendant filed a counterclaim for arrears in rent. |
10 Aug 2015 | Defendant | WonThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application. |
28 Oct 2014 | Defendant, Respondent | WonSecurity for costs awarded in favor of Marina Bay Sands in the amount of $75,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
13 Feb 2014 | Defendant, Appellant | LostAppeal against the decision of the AR in SUM 2743/2013 is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Oct 2013 | Defendant | WonApplication to strike out the writ of summons and statement of claim granted with costs awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Aug 2013 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the Plaintiff on its claim for $240,868.00, default interest on the Principal Amount of $240,868.00 at the contractual rate of 12% per annum calculated from 15 August 2010 until the date of receipt of full payment by the Plaintiff; and costs to be taxed on a standard basis unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
17 Feb 2013 | Defendant, Respondent | WonSuccessfully opposed the appeal, maintaining the original order for security for costs and the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim for failure to comply. |
29 Mar 2011 | Plaintiff | NeutralLeave to defend granted upon the condition that the defendant pay into court, or provide security by way of a banker’s guarantee, the full amount of the claim (ie the sum of $240,868.00 with interest on the said sum at the annual rate of 12% from 14 August 2010 until 25 March 2011 (without prejudice to the plaintiff’s claimed sums as stated in its pleadings)), by 26 April 2011, failing which the plaintiff would be at liberty to enter final judgment against the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |