Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa
Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 9 counsels. Through 8 law firms. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 46.2% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa has been represented by 8 law firms and 9 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Ong Ying Ping Esq | 3 cases |
| Shook Lin & Bok LLP | 1 case |
| Leo Fernando LLC | 1 case |
| M/s Leo Fernando | 1 case |
| Carson Law Chambers | 1 case |
| K K Cheng Law LLC | 2 cases |
| KK Cheng Law LLC | 1 case |
| Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 13.3
- Complex Cases
- 6 (46.2%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1313.3 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 59.0 parties avg |
| 2023 | 137.0 parties avg |
| 2022 | 321.3 parties avg |
| 2021 | 118.0 parties avg |
| 2020 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2019 | 23.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 13(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 10,000.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 5 |
| 2023 | 1 1 |
| 2022 | 1 3 |
| 2021 | 1 1 |
| 2020 | 1 1 |
| 2019 | 1 2 |
Case History
Displaying all 13 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
01 Aug 2024 | Applicant | LostApplication for stay of execution was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 Jul 2024 | Applicant | LostThe application for review was dismissed as it was prohibited under the Criminal Procedure Code. |
20 May 2024 | Applicant | LostThe applicant's second application for permission to review his conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
16 May 2024 | Applicant | LostThe application for Justice Tay Yong Kwang to recuse himself from hearing CM 15 was dismissed. |
26 Mar 2024 | Appellant, Applicant | LostAppeal dismissed due to lack of standing. |
04 Dec 2023 | Applicant | LostApplication dismissed for lack of standing and no reasonable cause of action. |
03 Aug 2022 | Appellant, Claimant | LostThe appeal against the decision to strike out the originating claim was dismissed. |
22 Jun 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 May 2022 | Plaintiff | LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
01 Dec 2021 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed. |
11 Oct 2020 | Applicant | LostThe applicant's application for leave to make a review application was dismissed. |
24 Nov 2019 | Appellant | LostMoad Fadzir's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed. |
14 Feb 2019 | Defendant | LostMoad Fadzir was found guilty as charged and sentenced to death. |