Rahmat Bin Karimon

Rahmat Bin Karimon is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 6 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Rahmat Bin Karimon has been represented by 6 law firms and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	1 case	Daniel Chia Hsiung Wen Eugene Lee
Allen & Gledhill LLP	2 cases	Leong Yi-Ming Chan Tai-Hui Jason SC Chan Tai-Hui Jason Tan Xue Yang Zeslene Mao Huijing
Clifford Law LLP	1 case	Aw Wee Chong Nicholas
K K Cheng Law LLC	2 cases	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
KK Cheng Law LLC	1 case	Ravi s/o Madasamy Cheng Kim Kuan
K Prasad & Co	1 case	Prasad s/o Karunakarn

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Rahmat Bin Karimon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.7
Complex Cases: 3 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	610.7 parties avg	10.7	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	219.0 parties avg	19.0
2021	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Rahmat Bin Karimon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2021	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2018	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghc-140 22 Jun 2022	22 Jun 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of the three applications, fixed at $20,000, are to be borne personally by Mr Cheng and Mr Ravi jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2022-sghc-184 11 May 2022	11 May 2022	Plaintiff	LostCosts of OS 1025 and SUM 4742 fixed at $10,000 and reasonable disbursements, to be paid to the Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2021-sghc-274 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
4	2021-sgca-74 04 Aug 2021	04 Aug 2021	Applicant	LostThe application for leave to review the earlier judgment was dismissed.
5	2018-sgca-62 02 Oct 2018	02 Oct 2018	Appellant	LostRahmat's appeal against his conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed.
6	2018-sghc-1 01 Jan 2018	01 Jan 2018	Defendant	LostConvicted of trafficking in a Class A controlled drug and sentenced to death.