Sandy Island Pte Ltd

Sandy Island Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 2 law firms.

Legal Representation

Sandy Island Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
LVM Law Chambers LLC	2 cases	Tang Jin Sheng Lok Vi Ming SC Chiam Yunxin Lok Vi Ming Joseph Lee Qabir Singh Sandhu Qabir Sandhu
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 case	Davinder Singh Irina Golovkovskaya Srruthi Ilankathir

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Sandy Island Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Sandy Island Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,308,645.48	654,322.742 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghc-69 30 Mar 2022	30 Mar 2022	Defendant	LostJudgment against the Defendant in the sum of $1,308,645.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2020-sgca-86 27 Aug 2020	27 Aug 2020	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay respondent costs for the appeal fixed at $50,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2019-sghc-175 25 Jul 2019	25 Jul 2019	Defendant, Plaintiff	PartialJudgment against the Defendant on the breach of contract claim, with the quantum of damages to be determined at a later stage. The court found that the defendant breached the SPA because the Property contained both general defects and lift defects. Monetary amount to be determined in the second tranche of the trial. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.