Teo Tian Seng
Teo Tian Seng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 17 counsels. Through 6 law firms. Their track record shows a 57.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Teo Tian Seng has been represented by 6 law firms and 17 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| TSMP Law Corporation | 2 cases |
| Rajah and Tann | 1 case |
| Stamford Law Corporation | 1 case |
| Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
| AsiaLegal LLC | 1 case |
| Central Chambers Law Corporation | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Teo Tian Seng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 9.4
- Complex Cases
- 7 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 39.0 parties avg |
| Won | 49.8 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2018 | 19.0 parties avg |
| 2015 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2012 | 111.0 parties avg |
| 2009 | 18.0 parties avg |
| 2008 | 18.0 parties avg |
| 2004 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Teo Tian Seng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 3(42.9%) |
| Won | 4(57.1%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 591,270.833 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 1 |
| 2018 | 1 1 |
| 2015 | 1 1 |
| 2012 | 1 1 |
| 2009 | 1 1 |
| 2008 | 1 1 |
| 2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
14 Mar 2019 | Plaintiff | WonCosts of $435,500 awarded for the Four Hearings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
21 Nov 2018 | Respondent | WonThe respondent was awarded damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50, jointly and severally from the appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Aug 2015 | Plaintiff | WonConsent Order set aside. |
11 Nov 2012 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiff's action to set aside the Consent Order was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 Feb 2009 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's application for a stay of the application was dismissed. |
22 Jun 2008 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiffs' application for further orders and/or clarification and/or variation of the consent order was dismissed. |
23 Feb 2004 | Defendant | WonPrayers (1) – (3) of SIC 5864 of 2003 were allowed. |