Actual Authority

Actual Authority is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 15 cases from 2009 to 2020.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Actual Authority, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC25.00% success rate4 cases26.7% of area
WongPartnership LLP33.33% success rate3 cases20.0% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate2 cases13.3% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP100.00% success rate2 cases13.3% of area
TanLim Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Mallal & Namazie100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Damodara Ong LLC0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Legal Clinic LLC100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Eldan Law LLP0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Actual Authority, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Lim Chee San100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Darrell Low Kim Boon0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Colin Liew100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Koh Swee Yen0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Abraham Vergis100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Suresh s/o Damodara0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Lin Weiqi Wendy0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Ong Ziying Clement0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Ang Cheng Hock100.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area
Lee Eng Beng0.00% success rate1 cases6.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 15 most recent judgments out of 15 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Tian Kong Buddhist Temple v Tuan Kong Beo (Teochew) Temple: Dispute over Temple Usage AgreementHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore10 Dec 2020
District Court Appeal No 33 of 2020 is allowed.
2Tamar Perry v Bonnet Esculier: Interpleader, Striking Out, Pleadings Amendment in Offshore CaseSingapore International Commercial Court29 Oct 2020
Application to strike out the unjust enrichment claim succeeded. Leave to amend the Writ and Statement of Claim was not granted in certain respects. The case was designated as an Offshore case.
3Ng Tang Hock v Teelek Realty: Oppression, Director Duties & Loan RepaymentHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore07 Oct 2020
Order for Teelek Realty to be wound up.
4Ong Keh Choo v Paul Huntington Bernardo: Dispute over Option to Purchase AgreementHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore02 Sep 2019
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
5Adinop Co Ltd v Rovithai Ltd: Breach of Confidentiality Agreement & ObligationsHigh Court29 May 2018
Plaintiff's action dismissed.
6G-Fuel Pte Ltd v. Gulf Petrochem Pte Ltd: Dispute over Marine Fuel Oil Contract FormationHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore13 Apr 2016
Judgment for Plaintiff
7Equatorial Marine v. Bunga Melati 5: Agency, Bunker Supply, & Shipowner LiabilityHigh Court21 Jul 2015
Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs.
8Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & UnconscionabilityHigh Court10 Mar 2015
Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid.
9Fairview v Ong & Ong: Architectural Services Dispute & Wrongful TerminationCourt of Appeal19 Jan 2014
Fairview's appeal dismissed; Ong & Ong's appeal allowed.
10Holland Leedon v C & P Transport: Warehouseman Negligence & Liability for Damaged Metal CoilsHigh Court30 Dec 2013
Judgment for Plaintiff
11Chua Kwee Sin v Venerable Sek Meow Di: Dispute over USD 1M Casino InvestmentHigh Court28 Nov 2013
Plaintiff's claim dismissed.
12Koh Chong Chiah v Treasure Resort: Breach of Membership Terms in Sijori Resort ClubHigh Court28 Nov 2012
Appeal Allowed in Part
13Law Society v K Jayakumar Naidu: Solicitor's Duty of Care & LoyaltyHigh Court02 Oct 2012
The respondent is suspended for a period of three months.
14Bing Integrated v Eco Special Waste: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy ClaimsHigh Court24 Oct 2010
Defendants’ claims in Suit No 605 of 2006/X and Suit No 606 of 2006/B against the 1st Third Party for breach of fiduciary duties by Colonel Chua are dismissed. The consequential allegations of conspiracy between Colonel Chua, Bing Integrated and 2nd Third Party are also dismissed.
15-30 Aug 2009
Unknown