Duty as to materials and workmanship

Duty as to materials and workmanship is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2010 to 2019.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Duty as to materials and workmanship, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Edmond Pereira Law Corporation0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Sterling Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
R. S. Wijaya & Co0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Tan Lim Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Kelvin Chia Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Legal Clinic LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Duty as to materials and workmanship, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Goh Chui Ling0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Edmond Pereira0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Lim Chee San0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Jeffrey Koh0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Ng Hweelon0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Low Ching Wei Justin0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Mindy Yap0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Jessica Cheung0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Josephine Choo0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Valerie Quay0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner'Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore14 Nov 2019
Appeal allowed in part; Cross-appeal allowed in part.
2Management Corporation v Orion-One: Construction Defects & Contractor NegligenceHigh Court26 Mar 2019
Judgment for Plaintiff in part.
3Rotol Projects v CCM Industrial: Sub-Contract Dispute over Variations & Payment for Aluminium and Glazing WorksHigh Court14 Apr 2014
Judgment for Plaintiff
4Chye Heng Huat Engineering v Concept Builders: Construction Dispute over Defective Steel FittingsHigh Court26 May 2010
Appeal allowed in part; judgment granted to the plaintiff for $304,458.06 with leave to defend for the remaining $85,799.87 on condition that the defendant pay the sum into court or provide a bank guarantee.