Duty to design

Duty to design is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2010 to 2019.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Duty to design, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
WongPartnership LLP0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Edmond Pereira Law Corporation0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Sterling Law Corporation0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
R. S. Wijaya & Co0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Tan Lim Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Kelvin Chia Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Legal Clinic LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Duty to design, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Goh Chui Ling0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Edmond Pereira0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Lim Chee San0.00% success rate2 cases50.0% of area
Jeffrey Koh0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Ng Hweelon0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Low Ching Wei Justin0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Mindy Yap0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Jessica Cheung0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Josephine Choo0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Valerie Quay0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner'Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore14 Nov 2019
Appeal allowed in part; Cross-appeal allowed in part.
2Management Corporation v Orion-One: Construction Defects & Contractor NegligenceHigh Court26 Mar 2019
Judgment for Plaintiff in part.
3Rotol Projects v CCM Industrial: Sub-Contract Dispute over Variations & Payment for Aluminium and Glazing WorksHigh Court14 Apr 2014
Judgment for Plaintiff
4Chye Heng Huat Engineering v Concept Builders: Construction Dispute over Defective Steel FittingsHigh Court26 May 2010
Appeal allowed in part; judgment granted to the plaintiff for $304,458.06 with leave to defend for the remaining $85,799.87 on condition that the defendant pay the sum into court or provide a bank guarantee.