Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement
Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 10 cases from 2009 to 2015.
Leading Law Firms
Analysis of law firms specializing in Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Law Firm | Cases |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate | 3 cases30.0% of area |
MPillay100.00% success rate | 2 cases20.0% of area |
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP0.00% success rate | 2 cases20.0% of area |
Bajwa & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Legal Solutions LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Jimmy Yap & Co0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Wong Tan & Molly Lim LLC100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Tan Peng Chin LLC0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Asia Ascent Law Corporation0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Notable Lawyers
Leading lawyers practicing in Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement, ranked by case volume and success rates.
Lawyer | Cases |
---|---|
Kronenburg Edmund Jerome0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Darrell Low Kim Boon0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Jiang Ke-Yue100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Quek Mong Hua100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Ang Cheng Hock100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Yap Neng Boo Jimmy0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Oommen Mathew0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Tan Chee Meng100.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Jimmy Yim0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Lee Eng Beng0.00% success rate | 1 cases10.0% of area |
Recent Judgments
Displaying 10 most recent judgments out of 10 total cases
No. | Title | Court | Decision Date | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | PT Selecta Bestama v Sin Huat Huat: Setting Aside Default Judgment and Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Barge Construction Dispute | High Court | 29 Jul 2015 | Default judgment set aside on condition that the Defendant pays $173,500 into court. No order made in relation to the stay application. |
2 | Equatorial Marine v. Bunga Melati 5: Agency, Bunker Supply, & Shipowner Liability | High Court | 21 Jul 2015 | Plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. |
3 | Boustead Singapore Ltd v Arab Banking Corp: Fraud, Demand Guarantees & Unconscionability | High Court | 10 Mar 2015 | Judgment for Plaintiff; ABC is injuncted from receiving payment from Boustead under the facility agreement demand and is injuncted from making payment to BCD on BCD’s counter-guarantee demands. The event-of-default notice is invalid. |
4 | Indian Overseas Bank v Svil Agro: Breach of Guarantee & Enforceability of Judgments | High Court | 29 May 2014 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
5 | Fairview v Ong & Ong: Architectural Services Dispute & Wrongful Termination | Court of Appeal | 19 Jan 2014 | Fairview's appeal dismissed; Ong & Ong's appeal allowed. |
6 | Holland Leedon v C & P Transport: Warehouseman Negligence & Liability for Damaged Metal Coils | High Court | 30 Dec 2013 | Judgment for Plaintiff |
7 | MovingU v Trans-Cab: Breach of Contract & Mobile Credit Card Reader Dispute | High Court | 27 Nov 2011 | Plaintiff's action is dismissed with costs; remedies prayed for in the Defendant's counterclaim are granted with damages to be assessed by the Registrar. |
8 | Seng Swee Leng v Wong Chong Weng: Specific Performance of Property Sale Agreement Dispute | Court of Appeal | 27 Nov 2011 | Appeal Allowed |
9 | Doshion Ltd v Sembawang Engineers: Dispute Over Settlement Agreement and Arbitration Termination | High Court | 27 Feb 2011 | Plaintiff's application dismissed. |
10 | Navigator Investment Services Ltd v Acclaim Insurance Brokers: Arbitration Stay & Pre-Action Discovery | Court of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore | 28 Sep 2009 | Appeal against the decision in Summons 5059 allowed, but appeal against the decision in Registrar’s Appeal 383 dismissed. |