Qualification of rights

Qualification of rights is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 6 cases from 2003 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Qualification of rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Bird & Bird ATMD LLP33.33% success rate3 cases50.0% of area
Ravindran Associates LLP50.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC0.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Harren (Ravindran Associates LLP)0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Lim & Lim100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
KhattarWong LLP0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Rodyk & Davidson100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Mirandah Law LLP100.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Qualification of rights, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Sivagnanaratnam Sivananthan33.33% success rate3 cases50.0% of area
Chan Wenqiang33.33% success rate3 cases50.0% of area
N Sreenivasan0.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Sukumar s/o Karuppiah50.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Loy Ming Chuen Brendan0.00% success rate2 cases33.3% of area
Deborah Evaline Barker0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Yip Shuen Kai0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Ng Sui Ping Penelope Ann0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Hewage Ushan Saminda Premaratne0.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area
Philip Jeyaretnam50.00% success rate1 cases16.7% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 6 most recent judgments out of 6 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Fonterra Brands v Consorzio: Parmesan as Translation of Parmigiano ReggianoCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore21 Nov 2024
Appeal Allowed
2-03 Nov 2024
Unknown
3Fonterra Brands v Consorzio: Parmesan as Translation of Parmigiano ReggianoGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore30 Mar 2023
Appeal Dismissed
4Australian Grape and Wine v Consorzio Prosecco: Geographical Indication Dispute over 'Prosecco' WineGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore22 Feb 2022
Appeal Allowed
5World Sport Group v Dorsey James Michael: Pre-Action Interrogatories & DefamationHigh Court09 Apr 2013
Appeal allowed in part. The defendant had to answer interrogatories nos 1, 2(a), 2(b), 2(c), 6 and 6.1.
6Elan Impex v Daewoo: Wrongful Termination, Service Out of Jurisdiction, and Forum Non ConveniensHigh Court07 Feb 2003
Action against the first defendant and fourth defendant struck out; orders giving leave to serve outside jurisdiction set aside; interim injunctions discharged; claim against the third defendant and the Mareva injunction against him stayed.