Time-Fixing Order

Time-Fixing Order is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 4 cases from 2005 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Time-Fixing Order, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
WhiteFern LLC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Harry Elias Partnership100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Parwani Law LLC0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Deputy Public Prosecutor0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Wong Partnership0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Wong Thomas and Leong0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Time-Fixing Order, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Anparasan s/o Kamachi100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Sunil Sudheesan100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Jasmine Thng Khai Fang100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Mahesh Rai s/o Vedprakash Rai0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Soon Ser Jia Clarissa0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Gregory Vijayendran0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Poon Kin Mun Kelvin SC100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Lim Shu Yi0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
Prakash Pillai0.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area
David Isidore Tan Huang Loong100.00% success rate1 cases25.0% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 4 most recent judgments out of 4 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1Hilton v Sun Travels: Contempt of Court for Failure to Comply with Arbitration AwardGeneral Division of the High Court of the Republic of Singapore08 May 2024
Sun Travels found in contempt of court and fined $100,000. Siyam, its director, initially sentenced to imprisonment, later substituted with a $100,000 fine upon full payment of the judgment debt.
2Pilgrim v Asian Appraisal: Negligence in Asset Valuation and Loan SecurityGeneral Division of the High Court16 Jan 2022
Plaintiff's claims dismissed.
3Tan Kay Beng v PP: Theft & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing AppealHigh Court06 Jul 2006
Appeal Allowed
4Tan Yeow Hiang Kenneth v Tan Chor Chuan: Review of Costs in Defamation ActionHigh Court09 Nov 2005
The court decided that it did not have the power to allow a further reduction on account of the failed defenses. The court also decided that, even if it were open to it to grant a reduction, no reduction ought to be allowed.