Share Valuation

Share Valuation is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 27 cases from 2000 to 2024.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Share Valuation, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law FirmCases
Drew & Napier LLC11.11% success rate9 cases33.3% of area
Allen & Gledhill LLP28.57% success rate7 cases25.9% of area
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP16.67% success rate6 cases22.2% of area
Straits Law Practice LLC33.33% success rate3 cases11.1% of area
WongPartnership LLP50.00% success rate2 cases7.4% of area
Niru & Co LLC0.00% success rate2 cases7.4% of area
Advocatus Law LLP50.00% success rate2 cases7.4% of area
Oon & Bazul LLP100.00% success rate2 cases7.4% of area
Rajah & Tann LLP100.00% success rate2 cases7.4% of area
Wong & Leow LLC0.00% success rate1 cases3.7% of area

Notable Lawyers

Leading lawyers practicing in Share Valuation, ranked by case volume and success rates.

LawyerCases
Lim Dao Kai33.33% success rate6 cases22.2% of area
Teng Po Yew0.00% success rate5 cases18.5% of area
Audie Wong Cheng Siew0.00% success rate4 cases14.8% of area
See Chern Yang0.00% success rate4 cases14.8% of area
Chew Xiang25.00% success rate4 cases14.8% of area
Dinesh Dhillon Singh66.67% success rate3 cases11.1% of area
Dhivya Rajendra Naidu33.33% success rate3 cases11.1% of area
Toh Kian Sing0.00% success rate3 cases11.1% of area
Margaret Joan Ling Wei Wei33.33% success rate3 cases11.1% of area
Soh Yu Xian Priscilla0.00% success rate2 cases7.4% of area

Recent Judgments

Displaying 27 most recent judgments out of 27 total cases

No.TitleCourtDecision DateOutcomes
1-14 May 2024
Unknown
2Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation DisputeSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT02 Mar 2023
Final valuation of Kiri’s shares adjudged to be US$603.8m for the buy-out order.
3Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Valuation of Shares in Oppression CaseSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL COURT07 Feb 2023
Quantity of infringing products produced by Longsheng determined to be 56,750 tonnes annually, with 53,550 tonnes used for notional license fee calculation.
4Kiri Industries v Senda International: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation AppealCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore05 Jul 2022
Appeal allowed in part.
5Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Share Valuation & OppressionSingapore International Commercial Court02 Jun 2021
Final valuation of DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd to be determined based on the court's conclusions.
6Kiri Industries Ltd v Senda International Capital Ltd: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Share ValuationSingapore International Commercial Court20 Dec 2020
Senda International Capital Ltd was ordered to purchase Kiri Industries Ltd’s shares in DyStar Global Holdings (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
7Siva Kumar v Quek Leng Chuang: Consent Order, Minority Oppression, Share ValuationCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore04 Nov 2020
Appeal Dismissed
8Tan Woo Thian v PricewaterhouseCoopers: Negligence Claim for Report on SBI Offshore's NPT TransactionsHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore12 Aug 2020
Claim Dismissed
9Tan Bee Hong Blossom v Tan Seng Keow Doreen: Winding Up & Family Business DisputeHigh Court of the Republic of Singapore29 Apr 2020
Plaintiffs’ action dismissed
10Teo Lay Gek v Hoang Trong Binh: Judicial Review of Valuation Dispute in Share Sale AgreementHigh Court26 Mar 2019
Plaintiffs' application allowed; the Ernst & Young Report was declared final and binding.
11Kiri Industries v Senda International Capital: Minority Oppression & Share ValuationSingapore International Commercial Court11 Mar 2019
Directions issued regarding the valuation of Kiri's shareholding and assessment of losses due to oppressive acts.
12Abhilash v Yeo Hock Huat: Share Valuation Dispute in Oppression SuitCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore25 Feb 2019
Appeal dismissed with costs.
13Abhilash v. Yeo: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Oppression ClaimHigh Court of Singapore29 Apr 2018
Judgment for the Defendants.
14Jayanti Nadarajoo v Bronwyn Matthews: Share Valuation Dispute under Companies ActHigh Court26 Aug 2015
Application granted; order allowing the Company to reduce its capital in the manner prayed.
15Official Assignee v Tay Lee Kiang: Misrepresentation and Conspiracy in Share SaleHigh Court10 Nov 2013
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
16Ng Swee Hua v Auston International: Breach of Contract & Damages for Failure to Issue Conversion SharesHigh Court14 Dec 2010
Appeal dismissed.
17Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler: Enforcing Consent Order for Share PurchaseCourt of Appeal23 Sep 2010
Appeal allowed in part; paragraph 2 of the Order of Court dated 26 January 2010 was set aside, with the rest of the Order of Court to stand.
18Woo Koon Chee v Scandinavian Boiler Service: Enforcement of Consent Order for Share TransferHigh Court02 Mar 2010
Application allowed.
19Lim Chee Twang v Chan Shuk Kuen Helina: Oppression, Corporate Veil & Minority Shareholder Rights in iPreciation Art GroupHigh Court17 Dec 2009
Judgment for the First Defendant, Ms. Chan, in part; orders made for buyout of Plaintiff's shares in certain companies.
20Yeo Boong Hua v Turf City Pte Ltd: Dispute over Share Valuation and Bidding ProcessHigh Court11 Feb 2009
Order granted for the bidding process to proceed.
21Yamashita Tetsuo v See Hup Seng Ltd: Construction of Deed of SettlementCourt of Appeal of the Republic of Singapore29 Dec 2008
Appeal Allowed
22Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Assessment of Damages for Breach of ContractHigh Court08 Jun 2008
Judgment for Plaintiff
23-10 Sep 2006
Unknown
24Foo Teow Keng v Ong Choo Guan: Minority Oppression under Companies ActHigh Court29 Jun 2005
Claim allowed.
25-29 Mar 2005
Unknown
26Ng Eng Kiat v Heap Huat Rubber: Pre-emptive Rights & Fraud in Share TransferHigh Court30 Aug 2000
Plaintiffs’ action dismissed with costs.
27Wu Fu Ping v Ong Beng Seng: Interpretation of Consent Order in Business Partnership DisputeHigh Court28 Jun 2000
Judgment for Plaintiffs in part; some claimed liabilities allowed, others disallowed; parties to bear their own costs.